|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 141-146
Evaluation of small-subunit rRNA touchdown polymerase chain reaction for direct detection of Entamoeba histolytica in human pus samples from patients with amoebic liver abscess
P Singh1, BR Mirdha1, V Ahuja2, S Singh1
1 Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India
2 Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India
|Date of Submission||19-Aug-2010|
|Date of Acceptance||23-Mar-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Jun-2011|
B R Mirdha
Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India., Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of touchdown polymerase chain reaction (TD-PCR) for the detection of Entamoeba histolytica in liver pus samples obtained from patients with a clinical diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess (ALA) using small-subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) as the target gene. Materials and Methods: Microscopic examination in vitro culture and serological test for the detection of E. histolytica in 67 pus samples obtained from ALA patients was performed. Molecular studies were carried out by both conventional PCR and TD-PCR targeting the SSU rRNA gene using the same sets of primers and the results were compared. Results: TD-PCR detected the presence of E. histolytica in 86.5% of the liver pus samples within 2.5 h as compared with 82.08% by conventional PCR within 3.5-4 h. Conclusion: TD-PCR assay may serve as a relatively better detection method for E. histolytica over conventional PCR with respect to the turnaround time, increased sensitivity, specificity and yield.
Keywords: Amoebic liver abscess, polymerase chain reaction, small-subunit rRNA, touchdown PCR
|How to cite this article:|
Singh P, Mirdha B R, Ahuja V, Singh S. Evaluation of small-subunit rRNA touchdown polymerase chain reaction for direct detection of Entamoeba histolytica in human pus samples from patients with amoebic liver abscess. Indian J Med Microbiol 2011;29:141-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Singh P, Mirdha B R, Ahuja V, Singh S. Evaluation of small-subunit rRNA touchdown polymerase chain reaction for direct detection of Entamoeba histolytica in human pus samples from patients with amoebic liver abscess. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 20];29:141-6. Available from: https://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2011/29/2/141/81795
| ~ Introduction|| |
Hepatic amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica is often diagnosed by suggestive clinical symptomatology, radiological investigations and positive serology. The diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis is most commonly attempted by direct microscopy, in vitro culture of a pus sample and serological tests. The sensitivity of microscopy is poor and is often confound with false-positive results due to misidentification of macrophages as trophozoites, polymorphonuclear cells as cyst and other Entamoeba species.  In vitro culture of E. histolytica is technically difficult and often not rewarding.  Detection of E. histolytica antibodies in patient's sera with a clinical diagnosis of amoebic colitis and ameobic liver abscess (ALA) is an adjunctive test. However, the interpretation of antibody test is often inconclusive in an endemic area.  Such discrepancies underscore the need for more sensitive, accurate and faster methods for the diagnosis of ALA. Several investigators have reported the successful application of conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of aomebiasis. ,, However, the conventional PCR assay is often encountered with technical problems of standardization, mispriming and production of non-specific products, followed by detection of amplified products. In contrast, touchdown PCR (TD-PCR) offers a simple and rapid means to optimize PCR with increased specificity, sensitivity and yield without the need of lengthy optimization and/or redesigning of primers. It also abrogates mispriming and production of non-specific PCR products.  We have optimized a novel TD-PCR targeting small-subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) and compared its results with conventional PCR to diagnose ALA.
| ~ Material and Methods|| |
The present prospective study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology at our tertiary care referral and teaching hospital. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional ethics committee (IEC). Sixty-seven (n = 67) patients were recruited over a period of 22 months with a clinical diagnosis of ALA. Clinical suspicion of ALA was made on the basis of clinical findings such as pain in the right upper quadrant of abdomen, tenderness in the right hypochondrium and hepatomegaly with or without fever. Corroborative radiological findings and supportive haematological and microbiological findings were also included.  From each patient, 5-7 ml of blood was collected aseptically in a collection tube without anticoagulant. Three milliliters to 5 ml of liver pus was aspirated under aseptic conditions under ultrasound guidance and transported to the laboratory as soon as possible. All clinical samples were stored at 4°C in order to maintain the structural integrity of the cellular components, until processed.
Microscopic examination of clinical specimens
Direct saline wet mounts from the pus samples were examined under the microscope for demonstration of trophozoites of E. histolytica.
Anti-E.histolytica immunoglobulin G antibody detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Serum from blood samples was used for performing the serologic test using a commercially available kit [RIDASCREEN E. histolytica IgG (1721); R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany].
Culture of pus samples
An in vitro culture was performed by inoculating the clinical samples into the National Institute of Health (NIH) medium. 
DNA extractions from pus samples were carried out using a commercially available REDExtract-N-Amp DNA extraction kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 100 μl of the extraction solution and 25 μl of the tissue preparation solution were pipetted out into a microcentrifuge tube. 10 of the sample was added to the solution and mixed thoroughly by vortexing followed by incubation at room temperature for 10 min and further incubation at 95°C for 3 min. Finally, 100 μl of the neutralization solution was added and mixed by vortexing. The neutralized sample extract was stored at 4°C or tested immediately using PCR. Strains of E. histolytica isolated earlier from stool samples and confirmed positive by both microscopy and by species-specific PCR and maintained in NIH medium served as the positive control for the PCR assay.
Polymerase chain reaction
Amplification of the SSU rRNA gene was carried out by using a published primers  (GenBank accession no. X64142). The forward primer sequence (EntaF) was derived from the central region of the SSU rRNA gene that is conserved for the genus Entamoeba, whereas the reverse primer is specific for E. histolytica. Primers were designed from signature sequences on the repetitive SSU rRNA sequences that are specific to E. histolytica.
Forward primer P1 5' - ATG CAC GAG AGC GAA AGC AT- 3'
Reverse primer P2 5' - GAT CTA GAA ACA ATG CTT CTC T-3
The size of the amplified product was 166 base pair (bp). The specificity of the primers was tested by subjecting them to BLAST.
Conventional polymerase chain reaction
For performing the PCR assay, the reaction mixture contained 10 μl of REDExtract-N-Amp PCR reaction mixture, 0.4 μl each of forward and reverse primer and 4 μl of tissue extract (DNA). Doubled-distilled PCR-grade water was added to the above mixture to make the total volume up to 20 μl. The PCR was performed by using an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of amplification at 94°C for 1 min, 65°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min in an ABI 2720 thermocycler (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA).
Touchdown polymerase chain reaction
The reaction mixture contained 5.2 μl of distilled water, 10 μl of REDExtract-N-Amp PCR reaction mixture, 0.4 μl each of forward and reverses primer and 4 μl of the tissue extract (DNA) for a total volume of 20 μl.
TD-PCR was performed using an initial pre-heating step of 10 min at 95°C and the TD was of 15 s at 94°C. The annealing step was performed at 62°C for 30 s and the temperature was further decreased to 52°C per cycle during the first 10 cycles and then treated for 15 s at 72°C. The subsequent 30 cycles were performed for 15 s at 92°C, 30 s at 52°C and 15 s at 72°C. Finally, an extension period of 5 min at 72°C was performed in an ABI 2720 thermocycler.
To avoid contamination, the reagent preparation, DNA extraction and amplification were performed in separate areas/rooms within the laboratory using different sets of micropipettes as well as filter tips. PCR mixtures and the extraction steps were prepared in a laminar flow cabinet. To further exclude possible contaminations, negative control (ultra-pure distilled water) was included in each PCR reaction/experiment.
Sensitivity and specificity of the touchdown polymerase chain reaction
Sensitivity of the TD-PCR was tested using different dilutions of the positive DNA in the ratio of 1:1, 1:5, 1:25, 1:125 and 1:625 in triplicate. Specificity of the PCR assay was determined by performing PCR against a panel of genomic DNA extracted from pus samples obtained from cases other than amoebic abscess. Pus samples obtained from a case of brain abscess due to Bacteroides fragilis and another from a suppurative lymphadenitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus were tested to rule out any non-specific amplification. No cross-amplification was observed.
Amplified products were directly loaded onto the 1.5% agarose gels without the addition of any gel-loading dye and the bands were detected and photographed under UV light.
| ~ Results|| |
A total of 67 subjects were diagnosed with ALA in the present study.
Results of microscopic examination, anti-amoebic antibody detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, culture, polymerase chain reaction and touchdown polymerase chain reaction
None of the samples showed the presence of motile trophozoites of E. histolytica either by microscopy or by in vitro culture. A total of 51 (76.11%, 51/67) patients were found to be positive for anti-E.histolytica IgG antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Bacteriological cultures were also performed in all pus samples (both aerobic and anaerobic culture). Only two pus samples grew bacteria on aerobic culture. The bacteria were identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis and aerobic spore bearers.  Both these bacteria are skin commensals and represent the probable contamination of pus samples by skin flora, and were not truly pathogenic to cause liver abscess. With the help of conventional PCR [Figure 1] and [Figure 2], 55 (82.08%, 55/67) patients were positive for E. histolytica. All 67 clinical samples aspirated from patients were further subjected to a TD-PCR assay by using the same set of primers as used in conventional PCR [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. By using the TD-PCR assay, three additional positive cases that were missed by conventional PCR were detected [Table 1] a and b. Thus, 58 (86.5%, 58/67) patients were found to be positive by TD-PCR. This was also able to detect DNA up to a 1:125 dilution of the positive control, thereby showing a greater sensitivity besides no non-specific amplifications [Figure 5].
|Figure 1: Standardization of polymerase chain reaction for Entamoeba histolytica – small-subunit rRNA gene|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Gel picture for the polymerase chain reaction for clinical samples – small-subunit rRNA gene of Entamoeba histolytica|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Standardization of touchdown polymerase chain reaction for Entamoeba histolytica – small-subunit rRNA gene|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Gel picture for the touchdown polymerase chain reaction for clinical samples – small-subunit rRNA gene of Entamoeba histolytica|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Serial dilution of positive control DNA in the ratio of 1:1, 1:5, 1:25, 1:125 and 1:625|
Click here to view
|Table 1a: Comparison of results of ELISA, PCR (166 bp) and TD-PCR (166 bp). with clinical features of patients with ALA (n= 67)|
Table 1b: Comparison of results of ELISA, PCR (166 bp) and TD-PCR (166 bp).
Click here to view
| ~ Discussion|| |
Diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis is generally endeavored by direct microscopy, in vitro culture of a pus sample and serological tests. The former two tests are not sensitive and the latter one is not definitive. Lack of sensitivity of microscopic examination to detect and differentiate the species of Entamoeba has made serological assays an adjunct tool for the diagnosis of invasive amoebiasis. However, studies have demonstrated the limitations of serological tests to diagnose ALA in the areas of endemicity. The use of conventional PCR has proved to be a better diagnostic tool for the detection of E. histolytica in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The success of the PCR results relies mainly upon the quality of the extracted DNA being used; therefore, optimization of the DNA extraction procedure is a critical step for the success of the PCR assay.  In the past, the isolation of DNA directly from samples was technically demanding and laborious. In recent times,simple and effective methods for the isolation of parasite-specific DNA has enhanced the sensitivity of PCR assay. However, many of these methods include multiple steps that are time-consuming and expensive. Hence, only a limited number of samples can be processed at a given point of time. But, the RED Extract-N-Amp PCR kit that was used to extract DNA from clinical samples have provided many advantages, ranging from low sample usage to less time consumption, i.e. only 15 min.
Furthermore, it is evident from the published literature that the conventional single-round PCR usually suffers with problems of standardization (including testing various concentrations of the reaction components such as Mg 2+ , dNTPs, primers and template), mispriming and production of non-specific products followed by difficulty in detection of amplified products, especially when amplifying products from genomic DNA. In the standardization procedure, the annealing temperature of the reaction is one of the most important parameters. A rapid way to determine the ideal annealing temperature is to use a temperature gradient across the thermal cycler block for the annealing step but, without a gradient block, annealing temperature optimization can be a lengthy process, requiring repeated runs to test each different annealing temperature. Nevertheless, there are methods that can be used to increase the specificity of the reaction without actually determining the optimal annealing temperature. On the other hand, TD-PCR offers a simple and rapid means to optimize the PCR assay, resulting in increased specificity, sensitivity and better yield of amplified products. TD-PCR is a method of polymerase chain reaction by which primers will avoid amplifying a non-specific sequence and the temperature at which primers anneal during a cycle of PCR determines the specificity of annealing. The melting point of the primer sets the upper limit on annealing temperature. At temperatures just below this point, only very specific base pairing between the primers and the template occur. At lower temperatures, the primers bind less specifically. Non-specific primer binding obscures the PCR results as the non-specific sequences to which primers anneal in the early steps of amplification will "swamp out" any specific sequences. This happens because of the exponential nature of the polymerase amplification. The earliest steps of a TD-PCR cycle have high annealing temperatures. The annealing temperature is decreased in increments for every subsequent set of cycles. The number of individual cycles and increments of temperature decrease can be adjusted accordingly. The primer will anneal at the highest temperature, which is least-permissive of non-specific binding. Thus, the first sequence amplified is the one between the regions of greatest primer specificity and is often most likely the sequence of interest. These fragments are further amplified during the subsequent rounds at lower temperatures, and will "out compete" with the non-specific sequences to which the primers may bind at these lower temperatures. If the primer, during the higher-temperature phases, binds to the sequence of interest, subsequent rounds of PCR can be performed upon the product to further amplify the above fragments. It is likely that TD-PCR would also be beneficial when the melting temperature of the two primers is different. TD-PCR has found wide applicability in standard PCR protocols and single-nucleotide polymorphism screening.
Other authors like You et al, reported the applicability of TD-PCR for detection of mutations in genes related to drug resistance in Mycobacterium leprae isolates from leprosy patients in Korea.  Similarly, Duckworth et al. proposed the utility of TD-PCR for increased sensitive and specific mutation detection in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.  Likewise, Piraee et al. projected the use of TD-PCR for more specific and sensitive amplification of the halogenase gene from Streptomyces venezuelae. Another investigator, Zumarraga et al. had also developed a rapid and sensitive TD-PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine samples by targeting the IS6110 element.  Fietto et al, described the construction of cDNA libraries using TD-PCR  and Horra et al, also compared single and TD-PCR protocols for detecting Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in paraffin-embedded lung tissue samples and suggested the enhancing effect of TD-PCR. 
We have standardized TD-PCR and compared its results with conventional PCR using the same set of primers that hybridizes with the SSU rRNA gene and generates a product size of 166 bp. With this TD-PCR assay, it was possible to detect E. histolytica DNA in a total of 58 (86.56%, 58/67) patients as compared with 55 (82%, 55/67) with conventional PCR. Moreover, the length of the TD-PCR assay was shortened to 2 h instead of 3.5-4 h that was noted in the conventional PCR. TD-PCR did not amplify any of the pus samples that were other than ALA. It also gave negative results with DNA extracted from different bacteria such as Escherichia More Details coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacteroides fragilis, Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which are some of the common causes of pyogenic liver abscess. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay was found to be 86.56% and 100%, respectively. The goal of the study was to improve the amplification sensitivity using TD-PCR.
When we did the cost analysis for both the serological and molecular methods, we found that the cost for ELISA, conventional PCR and TD-PCR were more or less same ($ 4/Rs. 200 per sample). However, TD-PCR had a relatively better sensitivity and specificity as compared with the other test. We were unable to detect E. histolytica-specific DNA in nine samples (n = 9) by TD-PCR, which could possibly be either due to the presence of some inhibitors such as blood that sometimes contaminate pus samples during aspiration or due to other unknown inhibitors present in the pus.
In conclusion, we have developed a sensitive and specific TD-PCR and our findings are in concordance with the published literature. Therefore, the present study proposes the use of a TD-PCR assay targeting the SSU rRNA gene for effective detection of E. histolytica DNA directly from the liver pus sample.
| ~ Acknowledgement|| |
This study was supported by a financial grant sanctioned to Dr B R Mirdha, corresponding author, by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
| ~ References|| |
|1.||Tanyuksel M, Petri WA Jr. Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003;16:713-29. |
|2.||Fotedar R, Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J, et al. PCR detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii in stool samples from Sydney, Australia. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1035-7. |
|3.||Haque R, Ali IK, Akther S, Petri WA Jr. Comparison of PCR, isoenzyme analysis, and antigen detection for diagnosis of E. histolytica infection. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:449-52. |
|4.||Nazir Z, Moazem F. Amoebic liver abscesses in children. Paediatr Infect Dis 1993;12:929-32. |
|5.||Zengzhu G, Bracha RY, Nuchamowitz W, Cheng W, Mirelman D. Analysis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and PCR of human liver abscess aspirates from patients in China for Entamoeba histolytica. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3034-6. |
|6.||Zaman Snone , Khoo Jnone , Ng SWnone , Ahmed Rnone , Khan MAnone , Hussain Rnone , et al. Direct amplification of E. histolytica DNA from amoebic liver abscess pus using polymerase chain reaction. Parasitol Res 2000;86:724-8. |
|7.||Khan U, Mirdha BR, Samantaray JC, Sharma MP. Detection of E. histolytica using polymerase chain reaction in pus samples from ALA. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006;25:55-7. |
|8.||Darren K, Mattick J. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat Protocols 2008;3:1452-6. |
|9.||Hamzah Z, Petmitr S, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S, Petmitr PC. Differential Detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii by a Single-Round PCR Assay. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:3196-200. |
|10.||Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Tests for identification of bacteria. In: Mackie and McCartney, editors. Practical Medical Microbiology, 14th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1996. p. 131-50. |
|11.||Ahuja V, Sharma MP. Amoebic Liver Abscess. J Indian Acad Commun Med 2003;4:107-11. |
|12.||You EYnone , Kang TJnone , Kim SKnone , Lee SBnone , Chae GTnone . Mutations in genes related to drug resistance in Mycobacterium leprae isolates from leprosy patients in Korea. J Infectnone 2005;50:6-11. |
|13.||Duckworth AW, Rule SA. The use of 'touchdown' polymerase chain reaction increases the sensitivity and specificity of t (11; 14) (q13; q32) detection in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2003;12:952-3. |
|14.||Piraee M, Vining LC. Use of degenerate primers and touchdown PCR to amplify a halogenase gene fragment from Streptomyces venezuelae ISP5230. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;29:1-5. |
|15.||Zumarraga JM, Meikle V, Bernardelli A, Abdala A, Tarabla H, Romano IM, et al. Use of touch-down polymerase chain reaction to enhance the sensitivity of Mycobacterium bovis detection. J Vet Diagn Invest 2005;17:232-8. |
|16.||Fietto JL, DeMarco R, Almeida V. Use of degenerate primers and touchdown PCR for construction of cDNA libraries. Biotechniques 2002;32:1404-8. |
|17.||Horra DeLaC, Varela JM, Friaza V, Respaldiza N, Munoz-Lobato F, Montes-Cano MA, et al. Comparison of single and touchdown PCR protocols for detecting Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in paraffin-embedded lung tissue samples. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2006;53:98-9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||Evaluation of antigen detection and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess in patients on anti-amoebic treatment
| ||Virendra Jaiswal,Ujjala Ghoshal,Sanjay S Baijal,Balraj Mittal,Tapan N Dhole,Uday C Ghoshal |
| ||BMC Research Notes. 2012; 5(1): 416 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|