Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 268 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (51 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 ~  Abstract
 ~  Raw material par...
 ~  Sterilization pa...
 ~  Physical parameters
 ~  Microbiological ...
 ~  Ecometric method
 ~  Productivity ratio
 ~  Contamination pa...
 ~  Gel strength par...
 ~  Present scenario
 ~  References
 ~  Article Figures
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded2892    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2005  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 159-163

Quality control of culture media in a microbiology laboratory

R&D Department, Microbiology Division, Span Diagnostics Ltd., Udhna, Surat – 394 210, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission21-Jun-2004
Date of Acceptance19-Oct-2004

Correspondence Address:
S Basu
R&D Department, Microbiology Division, Span Diagnostics Ltd., Udhna, Surat – 394 210, Gujarat
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.16586

Rights and Permissions

 ~ Abstract 

The nature of reporting of a microbiology laboratory depends upon the quality of the culture media used. Quality of media directly affects the observations and inferences drawn from the cultural characteristics of microorganisms. Checking of different parameters of media such as growth supporting characteristics, physical characteristics, gel strength and batch contamination can help to assess their quality. There are different methods to check all these parameters systematically. The meticulous performance of quality control of culture media can assure precision in reporting.

Keywords: Quality control, culture media

How to cite this article:
Basu S, Pal A, Desai P K. Quality control of culture media in a microbiology laboratory. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23:159-63

How to cite this URL:
Basu S, Pal A, Desai P K. Quality control of culture media in a microbiology laboratory. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2021 Jan 25];23:159-63. Available from:

Culture media play a pivotal role in any microbiology laboratory. They are widely employed for isolation, identification and sensitivity testing of different pathogenic microorganisms. Most of the laboratories usually prepare their own media for routine diagnostics as well as research purposes. However, to ensure that the media is of good quality and capable of giving satisfactory results, proper quality management system is essential. For that purpose certain parameters of media prepared should be thoroughly checked and then passed for laboratory use.

This article is aimed to provide certain information about the parameters to be considered and the tests to be performed to ensure proper quality of media. We have divided quality control procedures of media in different sections according to the parameters that need evaluation.

 ~ Raw material parameters Top

The quality of the media depends directly upon the quality of the raw materials used for their preparation. Water is the most important raw material used for the preparation of culture media. The parameters to be checked are presence of copper ions, conductivity and pH. Ideally there should be no copper ions present in water because it is inhibitory for the growth of microorganisms. The conductivity should be less than 15 µS (microsiemens). The pH of the water should be slightly on the acidic side, but should not be less than 5.5. [1]

The quality of  Petri dish More Detailses used for pouring of media is also an important factor. Normally petri dishes are ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilized or gamma irradiated. If EtO sterilized they should be then checked for residual EtO toxicity, as this may affect the growth of the microorganisms. The maximum permissible limit for residual EtO is 1 µg/g and it can be measured by standard gas chromatographic methods.[2] Only borosilicate glassware should be used because soda glass can leach alkali into the media.

There are various additives used in preparation of media. Blood is the most important one of them. Hence the quality of the blood plays an important role in the performance of the blood containing media. The sterility, homogeneity, viscosity and colour of the blood should be scrupulously checked before it is used for media preparation. For other additives the certificate of analysis and sterility conditions should be considered.

 ~ Sterilization parameter Top

Sterilization of the media plays an important role in the quality of the media. Generally autoclaving is carried out for sterilizing the media. However, the time of autoclaving and the quantity of media sterilized should be closely regulated.[1] Heat treatment of complex culture media may result in its nutrient destruction either by direct thermal degradation or by reactions between the components. Therefore, it is very important to optimize the heating process to minimize heating damages. The suggested cycle is stage 1:20-121°C, stage 2: < 100-121°C, stage 3:121-121°C and stage 4:121-80°C.

The volume of the media in one sterilization batch should be kept small, ideally two litres. Regular checking of the sterilization process by indicators should be done; temperature and pressure should also be constantly monitored. Sterilization indicators such as biological indicators and Bowie Dick test are available to check the efficiency of the process. Biological indicators such as spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus[3] can be used to check the spore killing efficacy.

 ~ Physical parameters Top

The gross physical appearance of media often suggests the quality. Media prepared should be screened for physical characteristics[4] such as excessive bubbles or pits, unequal filling of plates (uniform leveling), cracked medium in plate and freezing or crystallization.

All the above mentioned characters can be checked visually by naked eye. However, for unequal filling of plates, thickness of medium can be checked at four points. These four points are the two ends of the two diameters of the plate, which are at right angles to each other. Thus all the four sides can be simultaneously checked. The thickness at the four points is noted down and the mean thickness is determined and reported as mean thickness of the medium in the plate, which must be 4.0 ± 0.2 mm.[5]

The pH value of the medium is also one of the important physical characters, which must be checked.[1] It can be measured while preparation of the medium before and after autoclaving by using the standard pH meter after proper calibration with standard buffers.

 ~ Microbiological parameters Top

Growth supporting characteristics is the most important parameter while conducting quality control of media. Standard inoculating procedures should be used. The results should be examined both qualitatively and quantitatively and while testing new lots, both previous batch and new batch should be simultaneously grown.[1]

National committee for clinical laboratory standards (NCCLS) has laid down certain guidelines for the control organisms to be used for every medium, the desired inoculum concentration and their expected growth results. Inoculum for every medium can be prepared according to the following method:

The control organism is inoculated in soyabean casein digest (SCD) broth and incubated for 4 hours to get a cell density comparable to 0.5 McFarland′s standards . The standard suspension should give a colony count of 10 7- 108 cfu/mL (0.08-0.1 absorbance at 625nm). A 10 µL quantity of inoculum of 1in 10 and 1 in 100 dilution in normal saline or in SCD broth should be used for selective and nonselective media respectively.[6] These diluted inocula are used to ascertain the growth supporting capacity of the media. The inoculation is done in duplicates for each type of inoculum. After inoculation, the plates are incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and their growth and colony characteristics are observed. The results can be reported by mentioning presence or absence of growth and the growth characteristics in a tabular form as shown in [Table - 1].

In practice, the absolute measurements of growth of microorganisms are either time consuming or require sophisticated instruments. Colony size may be used to see the performance but it is again an insensitive indicator. Colony characteristics are subjective and very difficult to record.

Methods like ecometric method and proportional method, which gives us comparative data, are therefore suitable for routine quality control of microbiological performance of culture media. They can be utilized to check both the growth as well as inhibition characteristics of media.[7]

 ~ Ecometric method Top

This is a simple and numerical method. Both absolute growth index (AGI) and relative growth index (RGI) can be determined.[8] The method is based on streaking of inoculum to extinction. This method can be used to compare results with previous batches of same medium or between selective and nonselective media.

In this method five millilitre of brain heart infusion broth is inoculated with loopful of chosen test organism and incubated for four hours. The petri dish of given medium should be divided into 4 quadrants and streaking lines should be drawn on them as shown in [Figure - 1].

One microlitre loop has to be charged with culture and streaked in the way as A1, B1, C1, D1, A2, B2 .. upto D5 without flaming or recharging the loop. The procedure has to be repeated for the control plate. After incubation the last point should be noted in both test and control on which growth occurs. These are the end points of test and control media. These readings can be used to calculate the absolute growth index (AGI) and relative growth index (RGI) of the medium. The AGI is obtained by noting the end points [Table - 2].

The RGI is a comparison of the AGI of the test plate and control plate.

RGI = AGI Test x 100

AGI Control

The RGI varies according to the intended purpose of medium. In order to check efficiency the RGI should be close to 100%, whereas for checking inhibition it should be closer to 0%. The performance of a selective agar can be tested using an organism that has been selected to check isolation and using another that has been selected to check inhibition.

 ~ Productivity ratio Top

Determining the productivity ratio (PR) of a medium is another method of determining the performance relative to the control medium, which should be a nutritious agar like tryptone soy agar (TSA). The inoculum used must be same for both media and PR is calculated by counting the colonies on test and control media.

PR = No. of colonies on test x dilution factor

No. of colonies on control x dilution factor

The method follows the modified Miles & Misra technique. A tenfold dilution of an overnight culture of test organism is prepared in buffered peptone water. The test plates are divided into 4 quadrants and each quadrant is marked with the dilution to be used as shown in [Figure - 2].

tarting with highest dilution, each drop of the dilutions is placed on the relevant quadrant. Same step is repeated for control plate. Each drop is spread in the corresponding quadrant and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours. The colonies of the lowest dilution are counted for both test and control plates.

 ~ Contamination parameter Top

This is a very crucial parameter for the determination of the quality of media. The batch must be scrupulously checked for contamination before passing for laboratory use. It is also suggested that the whole batch of the prepared media be checked for contamination by keeping the plates at least for three days at room temperature.[9] Alternatively, two plates from the test batch can be taken and placed into the incubator set at 37°C for 24 hours. After required incubation, the plates are checked for any growth. If there is any growth, the process is repeated, taking again two plates from the same batch. If contamination occurs again, it is inferred that contamination has occurred in the prepared batch. As per recommendations more than 10% contamination requires the batch to be discarded.[10]

 ~ Gel strength parameter Top

Gel strength is an indication of level of solidification of the agar in the medium. The gel strength is measured by using a tripod stand with a central rod that is used to impart pressure on the agar. The lower end of the rod has a spherical portion, which rests on the medium surface. The upper end of the rod has a platform on which standard weights are placed. The spherical portion of the central rod is placed on the medium and weights are placed on the upper platform one by one and observed for some time. The process is continued until the agar breaks under the weight of the central rod. While calculating the gel strength the weight of the central rod should be deducted. The force imparted by the rod on the agar surface can be calculated by the formula: W pr2

Where, w = weight kept on the platform, r = radius of the spherical portion at the lower end of the central rod and p = 3.14.

A gel strength of about 300 - 500 dynes/cm2 will give satisfactory results (unpublished data)

Trouble shooting guide

[Table - 3] gives information about the various problems found in culture media and their probable causes.

 ~ Present scenario Top

The quality control (QC) of media used in clinical microbiology laboratory remains critical for accurate and acceptable isolation of pathogens from infected patients. Testing of media using standard protocol can save time and resources.[11] In a recent QC compliance study in Ontario, it was found that NCCLS QA recommendation was not followed at all. Moreover, recommended ATCC strains were used only in half of the participating laboratories.[12] Lot failure rates for all media ranged from 0.10% to 9.87% (average 1.01%) [13]. The reasons for failure were no growth (39.9%), no inhibition (18.6%), non-sterile (17.9%), haemolysis (7.2%) and surface defect (16.3%).

In another study it was found that the batch failure rates were rare (0.5%).[14] Krisher et al pointed out that 41 out of 109 respondents used only 50% or less information from NCCLS M22-A2. [15] In the recent document of NCCLS M22-A3, media are divided on the basis of the extrapolated quality control failure rates.[6] Media with extrapolated failure rate more than 0.5% require complete quality control by the user and are known as nonexempt media such as nutrient broth, Todd-Hewitt broth, MacConkey sorbitol agar, chocolate agar with IsoVitaleX, ® Campylobacter blood agar, brain heart infusion (BHI) both with 5% sheep blood / chloramphenicol and cycloheximide. Those with failure rate less or equal to 0.5% are exempt media for which minimal quality control is recommended. It will minimize the cost and unnecessary QC duplication.

 ~ References Top

1.Bridson E.Y. Culture Media In : The Oxoid Manual 8th edn. OXOID England: Limited Hampshire; 1998. p. 2-8.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Page B. ISO Standard redefines limits for ETO residuals. MDDI archive 1996.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Perkins JJ. Sterilizer control, sterilization indicators and culture tests. In : Principles and methods of sterilization in health sciences. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publishers; 1969. p. 483-500.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Evans GL, Bell RH, Cunningham LV, Ferraro MJ, Maltese AE, Pienta PA, et al . Quality Assurance for Commercially Prepared Microbiological Culture Media-; Approved standards- 2nd edn. NCCLS M22-A2,1996:16.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Ferraro MJ, Wikler MA, Craig WA, Dudley MN, Eliopoulus GM, Hecht DW, et al . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standards 8th edn. NCCLS M2-A8,2003:23.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Krisher K, Callihan DR, Jones RN, Luper DC, Miller JM, Sharp SE, et al . Quality Control for Commercially prepared Microbiological Culture Media; Approved Standards-3rd edn. NCCLS M22-A3,2004:24.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Anonymous. Quality Control of Culture Media. In : Culture Media Manual LAB M. (IDG Ltd., United Kingdom) 2002. P. 16-8.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Mossel DAA, Trees MG, Laarhoven BV, Anniek MT, Lightenberg M, Maria EBW. Quality assurance of selective culture media for bacteria, moulds and yeast: An attempt to standardization at international level. J Appl Bact 1983; 54 :313-27.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Arora DR. Quality Assurance in Microbiology. Indian J Med Microbiol 2004; 22 :81-6.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Duguid JP, Collee JG, Fraser AG, Aikman KW. Organization of the clinical bacteriology laboratory; quality assurance In : Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology 14th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London;1996. p. 1-16.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Weenk GH, vd Brink J, Meeuwissen J, van Oudenallen A, van Schievan RR. A standard protocol for the quality control of microbiology media. Int J Food Microbiol 1992; 17 :183-98.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Zoutman D, Fleming C, Richardson H. Compliance with NCCLS approved standard M22-A2 for the bacteriologic media quality assurance: a survey of 124 Ontario microbiology laboratories. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 42 :29-34.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Jones RN, Krisher K, Bird DS. Results of the survey of the quality assurance for the commercially prepared microbiology media. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127 :661-5.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.MacLowry JD, Edson DC, Dreskin R. CAP Microbiology Resource Committee survey of commercially prepared media. In : The role of Clinical Microbiology in Cost Effective Health Care. Skokie III. Smith JW. 1985. p. 555-9.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Krisher K. Survey results: the use of the NCCLS standard M22-A2 and Quality assurance for commercially prepared microbiologic culture media by clinical laboratories. Clin Microbiol Newsletter 2001; 23 :59-63.  Back to cited text no. 15    


[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]


[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Lethal doses of oxbile, peptones and thiosulfate-citrate-bile-sucrose agar (TCBS) for Acanthaster planci; exploring alternative population control options
Jairo Rivera-Posada,Ciemon F. Caballes,Morgan S. Pratchett
Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2013; 75(1-2): 133
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Contribution à la mise en place d’un système d’assurance qualité dans cinq laboratoires de bactériologie médicale au Togo
G. Katawa, A. Kpotsra, D. S. Karou, M. Eklou, K. E. Tayi, C. Souza
Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique. 2011; 104(1): 20
[VIEW] | [DOI]
3 Evaluation of TECRA broth, Bolton broth, and direct plating for recovery of Campylobacter spp. From broiler carcass rinsates from commercial processing plants
Richardson, L.J., Cox, N.A., Bailey, J.S., Berrang, M.E., Cox, J.M., Buhr, R.J., Fedorka-Cray, P.J., Harrison, M.A.
Journal of Food Protection. 2009; 72(5): 972-977
4 Detection of ESBL bacteria from clinical specimens: Evaluation of a new selective medium
Sharma, R., Cooke, R.P.D., Ratcliffe, J.G.
British Journal of Biomedical Science. 2008; 65(4): 191-194


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


© 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04