Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology Home 

SUPPLEMENT
[Download PDF]
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 337--338

Leptospirosis in Mumbai: Post-deluge outbreak 2005

M Maskey1, JS Shastri1, K Saraswathi1, R Surpam1, N Vaidya2,  
1 Department of Microbiology, Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Ch Hospital, Mumbai, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mumbai - 400 008, India

Correspondence Address:
J S Shastri
Department of Microbiology, Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Ch Hospital, Mumbai
India

How to cite this article:
Maskey M, Shastri J S, Saraswathi K, Surpam R, Vaidya N. Leptospirosis in Mumbai: Post-deluge outbreak 2005.Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:337-338

How to cite this URL:
Maskey M, Shastri J S, Saraswathi K, Surpam R, Vaidya N. Leptospirosis in Mumbai: Post-deluge outbreak 2005. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Jul 18 ];24:337-338
Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2006/24/4/337/29413

Full Text

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Humans are accidental hosts and can become infected through contact with an environment contaminated by the urine of a shedder host, such as a rodent. In tropical and subtropical regions, the disease is endemic and exposure to infection is widespread.[1] In India, leptospirosis is endemic in most of the urban areas, where epidemic outbreaks occur after flooding caused by heavy seasonal rainfall.[2],[3]

The severity of this acute febrile illness varies considerably from mild to rapidly fatal. The wide spectrum of symptoms and signs makes clinical diagnosis very unreliable. Leptospirosis is frequently under-diagnosed, due to non-specific symptoms early in the course of the disease and the difficulty of performing both, the culture and microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the reference serological test, which require experienced personnel. To overcome this problem, some potentially useful screening tests for the use in all routine laboratories have been proposed.[4],[5] Serology plays a pivotal role in the early diagnosis of leptospirosis.

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic tests for leptospirosis on patients in Mumbai. Mumbai, the financial capital of the country experienced incessant rains (944 mm in 24 hours) on 26th July 2005, causing floods and subsequent water-logging.

A large number of patients with fever came to the Nair hospital, a tertiary care center and the attached Infectious Diseases Hospital, the largest Infectious Diseases Hospital in South-East Asia. We also compared the prevalence of this disease over a period of five years as this acute febrile illness is widely recognized as a re-emergent disease.[6]

 Materials and Methods



1359 serum samples were obtained from patients admitted to the Nair Hospital and the Kasturba Hospital. These patients had history and clinical manifestations suggestive of leptospirosis, such as fever, anorexia, high-colored urine, conjunctival suffusion and decreased urine output. All the samples were screened by rapid tests/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests.

Rapid tests

Rapid tests used were Leptotek Dri-dot, Leptocheck WB and Leptostix.

ELISA

The kit used was Pan-Bio Leptospira IgM ELISA. Another kit used was IgM Microwell ELISA using L. biflexa Patoc I (serovar Patoc) as antigen. The results were interpreted as per the manufacturers' guidelines.

MAT

Paired serum samples obtained from 49 patients were sent to BJ Medical College, Pune, for confirmation by MAT. The serovars used were Australis, Bataviae, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Hebdomadis, Pomona, Tarassovi, Canicola and Autumnalis.

 Results



Prevalence of leptospirosis during July, August and September in the years 2001-2005 was compared and a 8-fold rise in the year 2005 was observed [Figure 1]. The 432 positive cases in 2005 were diagnosed either by rapid tests / ELISA subject to availability.

The results on the 49 paired serum samples showed that all of them were positive by Lepto Dri-dot, 47 were positive by Panbio ELISA and only 24 were positive by MAT. Various studies have compared MAT, the reference test for leptospirosis, the Lepto Dri-dot assay and have shown an overall sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%.[7] Panbio Leptospira IgM ELISA has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95%.[8] Our study reveals the conformance of Screening tests with MAT as 48.97% in 2005 and 86% in the year 2004.

The various serovars identified in the year 2005 were Icterohaemorrhagiae (13), Bataviae (10), Tarassovi (4), Canicola (2), Australis (1) and Pomona (1). In the year 2004, the serovars predominant were Canicola (17), Icterohaemorrhagiae (13), Australis (7), Pomona (3) and Pyrogenes (3). Icterohaemorrhagiae and Tarassovi were identified in two samples, which were negative by ELISA and positive both by rapid tests and MAT.

 Discussion



The diagnosis of leptospirosis is often unconfirmed because of the lack of clinical suspicion, inappropriate sample collection and unavailability of testing facilities or a combination of these factors.[9] Serology plays a pivotal role in the early diagnosis of leptospirosis. Though MAT is the most widely used reference test, it has many limitations.[5] It is time-consuming and needs specialised personnel for its execution and the laboratory has to maintain strains for the preparation of live antigens. Knowledge of the prevalent serovars in a particular geographic area is required, as otherwise it would be cumbersome to test more than 200 serovars of L. interrogans and over 60 serovars of L. biflexa , especially in the situation of an outbreak. Examination of a large number of serum specimens during a situation of an outbreak may also compromise the quality of the results. Thus, there is an urgent need for a highly sensitive and specific test for early diagnosis of leptospirosis. Several rapid assays have been developed recently,[7],[9] which can be used for the screening of acutely ill patients. The sensitivity of these tests ranges from 96.5 to 100% and specificity from 95 to 99.8%.[7],[8] These tests are simple to perform, require minimum equipment and their interpretation is easy, curtailing technical expertise. As many of these tests have inbuilt controls, they are economical for single sample testing. When large numbers of samples need to be tested, conventional ELISA was preferred.

In our observations in Mumbai in 2005, there was an eight-fold rise in the number of cases during August 2005 after heavy rainfall and water-logging. A significant finding was a sharp decline in the conformance of rapid/ELISA vis--vis MAT, as compared to the previous year. The various reasons for this could be inappropriate timing of sample collection, unavailability of paired sera and a restricted number of serovars used for confirmation. It was possible that new serovars were seen in this outbreak. As the prevalent serovars in this geographic area has not been determined and leptospirosis is endemic in the city of Mumbai, a detailed study is required.

References

1Ko AI, Galvao Reis M, Ribeiro Dourado CM, Johnson WD Jr, Riley LW. Urban epidemic of severe leptospirosis in Brazil. Salvador Leptospirosis Study Group. Lancet 1999; 354: 820-5.
2Sehgal SC, Murhekar MV, Sugunas AP. Outbreak of leptospirosis with pulmonary involvement in North Andaman. Indian J Med Res 1995; 102: 9-12.
3Sehgal SC, Sugunas AP, Vijayachari P. Outbreak of leptospirosis after the cyclone in Orissa. Natl Med J India 2002; 15: 22-3.
4Adler B, Murphy AM, Locarnini SA, Faine S. Detection of specific anti- Leptospira l immunoglobulins M and G in Human serum by solid-phase enyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 11: 452-7.
5Pappas MG, Ballow RW, Gray MR, Takafuji ET, Miller RN, Hockmeyer WT. Rapid serodiagnosis of leptospirosis using the IgM specific dot-ELISA: Comparison with the microscopic agglutination test. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1985; 34: 346-54.
6Brandling-Bennett AD, Penheiro F. Infectious diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean: Are they really emerging and increasing? Emerg Infect Dis 1996; 2: 59-61.
7Smits HL, van der Hoorn MA, Goris MG, Gussenhoven GC, Yersin C, Sasaki DM, et al . A simple latex agglutination assay for the rapid serodiagnosis of human leptospirosis. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1272-5.
8Vitale G, La Russa C, Galioto A, Chifari N, Mocciaro C, Caruso R, et al . Evaluation of an IgM-ELISA test for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis. New Microbiol 2004; 27: 149-54.
9Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:296-326.