Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 1349 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (249 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  References
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2076    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded170    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 160-161
 

Report of carbapenem resistant Ps. aeruginosa, isolates carrying ESBLs, AmpC and MBL enzymes based on phenotypic methodology and susceptibility to Fosfomycin


Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Date of Submission07-Mar-2013
Date of Acceptance09-Oct-2014
Date of Web Publication6-Feb-2015

Correspondence Address:
V Gupta
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.150954

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Garg R, Gupta V, Chander J, Kaur M. Report of carbapenem resistant Ps. aeruginosa, isolates carrying ESBLs, AmpC and MBL enzymes based on phenotypic methodology and susceptibility to Fosfomycin. Indian J Med Microbiol 2015;33, Suppl S1:160-1

How to cite this URL:
Garg R, Gupta V, Chander J, Kaur M. Report of carbapenem resistant Ps. aeruginosa, isolates carrying ESBLs, AmpC and MBL enzymes based on phenotypic methodology and susceptibility to Fosfomycin. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Aug 18];33, Suppl S1:160-1. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2015/33/5/160/150954


Dear Editor,

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can harbour several mechanisms of resistance, which generates multi-drug resistant (MDR) or pan-resistant (PDR) isolates. [1] For treating infections with MDR, P. aeruginosa limited drug options are there like polymyxins alone or in various combinations. Recently, efficacy of fosfomycin has been seen in severe infections, including those due to MDR bacteria, especially in P. aeruginosa that  Escherichia More Details coli even in critical situations. [2]

Based on this, a study was planned on MDR P. aeruginosa from pus samples of indoor patients with the following objectives: To evaluate various phenotypic assays for enzyme production amongst the P. aeruginosa isolates and to determine fosfomycin susceptibility for the isolates by E-test methods (Biomerieux).

One hundred non-duplicate isolates of P. aeruginosa that were MDR were obtained from pus samples received in the Microbiology department of the Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, over a period of one year were included in this study. The identification of the isolates was done by standard biochemical methods. An antibiotic susceptibility method using 10 antibiotics covering most Gram-negative organisms was followed and helped in screening for  extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC ß-lactamases together with carbapenem susceptibility. The antibiotics used were ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefoxitin, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and piperacillin-tazobactam. The sensitivity pattern of these isolates to various antibiotics was studied by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The detection of different classes of ß-lactamases enzymes that is ESBL, AmpC, and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa was done by standard protocols. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fosfomycin was tested by E-test method with fosfomycin gradient concentrations ranging from 0.04 μg/ml to 1,024 μg/ml added along with 50 μg/ml glucose-6-phosphate. [3]

Out of 100 imipenem/meropenem non-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates, those producing various enzymes alone and in combination is depicted in [Table 1]. Out of 100 isolates, one isolate of P. aeruginosa showed all the three β-lactamase resistance mechanisms [Table 1]. Falagas et al., in their study have also reported similar results. [4] All the isolates were MDR. The MIC of fosfomycin for different MDR isolates of P. aeruginosa having different enzymes is also shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Distribution of fosfomycin MICs in 100 MDR  P.aeruginosa Scientific Name Search  clinical isolates

Click here to view


The limited therapeutic options against P. aeruginosa stresses upon the usefulness of testing for fosfomycin susceptibility, particularly to support the combination therapy when MIC values are ≤128 μg/ml. [5] In P.aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to other antimicrobial agents and having MIC of <32 μg/ml for fosfomycin, combination of fosfomycin with other agents has good activity. It is speculated that fosfomycin induces new permeability routes for antimicrobial agents into the outer membrane by destroying the outer membrane of bacteria and thus increase the permeability of antimicrobials. [6]

In soft-tissue infection treatment, there is high inter individual variability in the  pharmacokinetic (PK) of fosfomycin in pus due to highly variable abscess permeability. Antimicrobial effective levels of fosfomycin in pus may be reached with a significant or critical delay in some abscesses. However, prolonged half-life and sustained high concentration have been achieved with multiple doses in some patients. Although overall tissue distribution is good, the clinical response depends on the location of pus/abscess cavities as well. Fosfomycin has excellent tissue penetration properties, which may be attributed to its low molecular weight, low plasma protein binding, high hydrophilicity, and a good volume of distribution. Despite favourable tissue penetration of fosfomycin, monotherapy with fosfomycin has limited use because of the rapid development of resistance and so it is advised to use fosfomycin with other antimicrobials. [7] However, fosfomycin single time oral therapy has been recommended in uncomplicated urinary tract infection. [8]

Thus the present study emphasizes the high prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa producing β-lactamase enzymes of diverse mechanisms. Fosfomycin MICs as shown are still less in India and so for treating abscesses combination of fosfomycin with other antimicrobials represents good option as it shows high-tissue penetration in soft- tissue infections.

 
 ~ References Top

1.
Tam VH, Chang KT, Abdelraouf K, Brioso CG, Ameka M, McCaskey LA, et al. Prevalence, resistance mechanisms, and susceptibility of multidrug-resistant bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:1160-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Dinh A, Salomon J, Bru JP, Bernard L. Fosfomycin: Efficacy against infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Scand J Infect Dis 2012;44:182-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chislett RJ, White G, Hills T, Turner DP. Fosfomycin susceptibility among extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase- producing Escherichia coli in Nottingham, UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:1076-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Falagas ME, Kanellopoulou MD, Karageorgopoulas DE, Dimopoulos G, Rafailidis PI, Skarmoutsou ND, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug resistant Gram negative bacteria to fosfomycin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008;27:439-43.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Anuilar MD, Morosini MI, Campo RD, Castillo MG, Zamora J, Canton R. In vitro activity of fosfomycin against a collection of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 16 Spanish Hospitals: Establishing the validity of Standard Broth Microdilution as Susceptibility Testing Method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:5701-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Asano N, Araki K, Shukuya N, Egami T, et al. Effectiveness of fosfomycin combined with other antimicrobial agents against multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates using the efficacy time index assay. J Infect Chemother 2002;8:37-42.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sauermann R, Karch R, Langenberger H, Kettenbach J, Mayer_Helm B, Petsch M, et al. Antibiotic abcess penetration: Fosfomycin levels measured in pus and simulated Concentration-Time profiles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4448-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gupta V, Rani H, Singla N, Kaistha N, Chander J. Determination of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases and AmpC production in uropathogenic isolates of escherichia coli and susceptibility to fosfomycin. J Lab Physicians 2013;5:90-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04