Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 1015 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (283 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  Abstract
 ~ Introduction
 ~  Materials and Me...
 ~ Results
 ~ Discussion
 ~ Acknowledgment
 ~  References
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4623    
    Printed151    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded134    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 203-207
 

ermA, ermC , tetM and tetK are essential for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia


1 Microbiology Division, Institute of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Biomedical Science and Molecular Typing Laboratory, A407, Institute of Graduate Studies, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Date of Submission23-Oct-2011
Date of Acceptance28-Feb-2012
Date of Web Publication28-May-2012

Correspondence Address:
K L Thong
Microbiology Division, Institute of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Biomedical Science and Molecular Typing Laboratory, A407, Institute of Graduate Studies, 50603 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.96693

Rights and Permissions

 ~ Abstract 

The objective of this study was to determine the expression and transferability of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance among 188 MRSA strains from a Malaysian tertiary hospital. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for oxacillin, erythromycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin ranged from 4 to 512 μg/ml, 0.25 to 256 μg/ml, 0.5 to 256 μg/ml and 0.5 to 512 μg/ml, respectively. Tetracycline-resistant strains showed co-resistance towards ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) of high-level tetracycline (≥MIC 256 μg/ml) and erythromycin (≥MIC 128 μg/ml) resistant strains in between the years 2003 and 2008. All erythromycin-resistant strains harboured ermA or ermC gene and all tetracycline-resistant strains harboured tetM or tetK gene. The blaZ was detected in all MRSA strains, whereas ermA, tetM, ermC, tetK and msrA genes were detected in 157 (84%), 92 (49%), 40 (21%), 39 (21%) and 4 (2%) MRSA strains, respectively. The blaZ, tetM, ermC and tetK genes were plasmid-encoded, with ermC gene being easily transmissible. Tn5801-like transposon was present in 78 tetM-positive strains. ermA and tetM genes were the most prevalent erythromycin and tetracycline resistance determinants, respectively, in MRSA strains. The association of resistance genes with mobile genetic elements possibly enhances the spread of resistant traits in MRSA.


Keywords: Ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, tetracycline, transformation


How to cite this article:
Lim K T, Hanifah Y A, Yusof M, Thong K L. ermA, ermC , tetM and tetK are essential for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Indian J Med Microbiol 2012;30:203-7

How to cite this URL:
Lim K T, Hanifah Y A, Yusof M, Thong K L. ermA, ermC , tetM and tetK are essential for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Oct 22];30:203-7. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2012/30/2/203/96693



 ~ Introduction Top


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Scientific Name Search  (MRSA) is an important bacterial pathogen associated with community (CA) and health-care (HA) infections in Malaysia and worldwide. A local study reported that the MRSA strains in Malaysia are often resistant to erythromycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. [1]

In many cases, erythromycin resistance is also associated with the resistance to other macrolides, lincosamides and type B streptogramin (MLS B ). There are three mechanisms involved in erythromycin resistance: (i) the use of an energy-dependent efflux, (ii) production of inactivating enzymes and (iii) alteration of 23S rRNA methylases. [2] On the other hand, tetracycline resistance is mediated by enzyme inactivation, ribosomal protection proteins and efflux proteins. [3]

Currently, there is no report on the distribution of erythromycin and tetracycline-resistance genes among MRSA strains in Malaysia. Thus, this study was aimed at determining the expression and transferability of erythromycin and tetracycline resistance of MRSA strains isolated from a local teaching hospital in Malaysia.


 ~ Materials and Methods Top


In this study, 188 MRSA strains including 162 from our previous study, which were resistant to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin or tetracycline, were further analysed. The remaining new strains were obtained from the year 2004 (n=9), 2007 (n=16) and 2008 (n=1).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of resistance genes for erythromycin (ermA, ermB, ermC and msrA), tetracycline (tetK, tetL, tetM, tetO and tetS), β-lactams (blaZ) and tetracycline transposon-associated genes (Tn916 and Tn5801) were carried out as previously described [4],[5],[6],[7] using both genomic and plasmid DNA as PCR templates.

Plasmid DNA from 30 selected MRSA strains were electroporated into S. aureus ATCC29213 as previously described by Lannergard et al. [8] with minor modifications. Briefly, 40 μl of electrocompetent cells were mixed with 2-5 μg of plasmid DNA, transferred to a 1-mm electroporation cuvette and electroporated using a Bio-Rad gene pulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules CA, USA). The gene pulser was set at 200 Ω resistance, 25 μF capacitance and 2.5 kV. Transformants were selected on Typtic Soy Agar plates supplemented with either erythromycin (50 μg/ml) or tetracycline (50 μg/ml).

The antimicrobial susceptibility of transformants to three antimicrobial agents [oxacillin (1 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and erythromycin (15 μg) (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK)] was determined by disc diffusion method. [9] The presence of erythromycin-resistance gene in transformants was detected by PCR as described earlier. Size determination of the plasmids extracted from transformants was carried out by digestion of plasmid DNA with EcoRI (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and the products were separated in 0.8% agarose gel for 6 h at 90 V.

Statistica software (version 8.0, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa OK, USA) was used for data analysis. Comparisons of certain variables were done by Fisher's exact test. The association between different resistance genes and their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined by Spearman's rank order correlation test and Kruskal-Wallis test. The letter "H" refers to Kruskal-Wallis test. P value <0.05 (two-tailed) was taken as the level of significance for Fisher' exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. The breakpoints for association of resistance factors are defined as follows: Perfect association with R=1, no association with R=0 and inverse correlation with R=−1.


 ~ Results Top


All strains were resistant to oxacillin (MIC 4-512 μg/ml). The MIC for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline ranged from 0.25 to 256 μg/ml, 0.5 to 512 μg/ml and 0.5 to 256 μg/ml, respectively. The temporal changes in the MIC of four antimicrobials for MRSA are summarised in [Table 1]. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) of high-level erythromycin (128 and 256 μg/ml), medium- (16 μg/ml) to high-level tetracycline (256 μg/ml) and medium-level ciprofloxacin (64 μg/ml) resistant strains between the years 2003 and 2008.
Table 1: MIC values of oxacillin-, erythromycin-, ciprofl oxacin- and tetracycline-resistant MRSA strains from a
tertiary teaching hospital at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


Click here to view


Based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test, the correlation between erythromycin and ciprofloxacin resistance was observed (R=0.607, P<0.05). Similarly, correlations between erythromycin and tetracycline (R=0.1922, P<0.05), and ciprofloxacin and tetracycline (R=0.0795, P<0.05) were also observed. The values indicate that tetracycline-resistant strains most likely to show co-resistance towards ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. Similarly, these values also indicate that erythromycin-resistant strains were most likely to show co-resistance towards ciprofloxacin and tetracycline.

Established primers for detection of erythromycin-, tetracycline- and β lactam resistance genes were carried out on genomic DNA of 188 MRSA strains. The results showed all erythromycin?resistant strains harboured either -lactam-resistance genes were carried out on genomic DNA of 188 MRSA strains. The results showed all erythromycin-resistant strains harboured either ermA, ermC or msrA gene and tetracycline-resistant strains harboured either tetK or tetM gene. Specifically, blaZ gene was detected in all strains, whereas ermA, tetM, ermC, tetK and msrA specific amplicons were detected in 157 (84%), 92 (49%), 40 (21%), 39 (21%) and 4 (2%) strains, respectively. However, no amplicon was obtained with primers that were specific for the ermB, tetL, tetO and tetS genes.

Majority (78%) of tetracycline-resistant strains harboured tetK and tetM genes with MIC ranging from 16 to 64 μg/ml. Based on the Kruskal-Wallis test, no significant difference was found between the level of erythromycin resistance for 2008 strains and the presence of different types of erythromycin-resistance genes (H=5.29, df=2, P=0.071).

PCR amplifications using plasmid DNA as templates were carried out in parallel with additional 16S rRNA primers to preclude chromosomal DNA contamination. Results showed ermC, tetK, tetM and blaZ amplicons were detected with absence of 16S rRNA specific amplicon. This indicates that ermC, tetK, tetM and blaZ genes were plasmid-borne.

On the other hand, Tn5801-like transposon was detected in 78 tetM-positive strains, and no Tn916-like transposon was detected. Based on Spearman's rank correlation test, correlation between tetM and Tn5801 was observed (R=0.8647, P<0.05).

Plasmid analyses showed that 176 (94%) MRSA strains harboured 1-12 plasmids with sizes ranging from 1.9 to 169 kb. Transformation studies were performed on 30 randomly selected MRSA strains that harboured the plasmids. Plasmid transfers for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance were done by electroporation with the recipient S. aureus ATCC29213. However, the transfer only yielded success in 6 out of 30 strains for erythromycin resistance and no transfer of tetracycline resistance was observed. Further analysis showed that all resultant transformants were resistant to erythromycin (MIC 50-256 μg/ml). All transformants were sensitive to tetracycline since no tetracycline-resistance phenotype was transferred (based on the disc diffusion test).

Only ermC gene in the parental MRSA strains was successfully transferred into recipient S. aureus ATCC29213, suggesting that this resistant determinant was likely plasmid encoded. Plasmids of sizes ranging from 2.5 to 89 kb were detected in six transformants. Identical EcoRI restriction profiles were obtained from two plasmids extracted from donor MRSA (MRSA0812-1 and MRSA0804-1) and their respective transformants. The other plasmids extracted from transformants were smaller than plasmids from the donors. All the transformants which carried ermC contained plasmids with sizes of~2.5 to 2.7 kb.


 ~ Discussion Top


In our previous report, high oxacillin-, erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates were observed in 162 MRSA strains based on the disc diffusion test only. Significant increase in tetracycline-resistance rate was also observed. Thus, we further extended the study to determine the association between MIC values and presence of resistance genes of erythromycin and tetracycline-resistant strains and its transferability.

The significant increase of high-level tetracycline- (MIC≥256 μg/ml) and erythromycin (MIC≥128 μg/ml)-resistant strains between 2003 and 2008 along with the co-resistance between erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline is worrisome because choices of antimicrobial agents for treatment of life-threatening cases will be limited. Furthermore, use of tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin is still very common in Malaysian hospitals for treatment of respiratory tract and other nosocomial infections. [10]

Erythromycin and tetracycline resistance is always attributed to the presence of resistance genes. In this study, the predominant resistance gene reported in erythromycin-resistant strains was ermA. This differs from the report by Spiliopoulou et al. [11] where most of their erythromycin-resistant strains harboured ermC gene. In addition, our results also showed that presence of different erythromycin-resistance genes (ermA, ermC and msrA) was not directly related to higher MIC values (based on Kruskal-Wallis test). For example, 31% of erythromycin-resistant strains that harboured ermA or ermC gene was associated with an MIC value of 8-64 μg/ml. However, this differs from the report by El-Madhy et al. [12] as all their ermC-positive strains displayed higher MIC values (MIC>1024 μg/ml). A majority of tetracycline-resistant strains harboured tetM (97%) followed by tetK (41%) gene. This is in contrast to reports by Jones et al. [13] and El-Madhy et al. [12] where tetK gene was the predominant gene in tetracycline-resistant strains. Spearman's rank correlation tests showed that a strain which harboured tetK gene also harboured tetM gene. This is in agreement with the report of Schmitz et al., [14] as their MRSA strains also harbour both tetK and tetM. Schmitz et al. [14] also reported that strains with both tetK and tetM genes often display higher MIC values than strains containing a single gene. In contrast, our study showed that the combination of tetK and tetM genes did not display higher MIC values as over 78% of the strains that harboured both tetK and tetM together were associated with an MIC value of 16-64 μg/ml. De Vries et al. [8] reported that tetM gene is located on both Tn5801-like and Tn916-like transposons. Their finding coincided with our data as majority (85%) of the tetM gene reported here was located on Tn5801-like conjugative transposon. Moreover, result of Spearman's rank correlation test also established the correlation between tetM and Tn5801.

Transformation experiments showed that only ermC was transmissible. Although Monecke et al. [15] reported that tetK gene is plasmid-borne and transmissible, none of the tetK genes was transferable in this study. Similarly, no tetM gene was transferable. Discrepancy observed might be due to the inherent property of recipient S. aureus ATCC29213 as Schenk and Laddaga [16] reported that this strain ATCC29213 has lower transformation efficiency when compared to another recipient strain, RN4220.

Size of the plasmid carrying ermC gene reported in this study was similar to the plasmid size (2.5 kb) reported by Westh et al. [17] Based on the EcoR1 restriction profiles obtained, the size of plasmids that were isolated from the transformants (~2.5 to 81 kb) was slightly smaller than its donor (~2.5 to 89 kb). This was probably because the donor strains harboured more than a single type of plasmids.

In conclusion, tetracycline-resistant strains often showed co-resistance towards ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. The ermA and tetM were the predominant genes detected in erythromycin- and tetracycline-resistant strains, respectively. The presence of ermA, ermC, tetM and tetK genes was responsible for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance among Malaysian MRSA strains. Association of resistance genes (ermC, tetM and tetK) with mobile genetic elements possibly enhances the spread of resistant traits in MRSA. The persistence of erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline resistance remains a problem in UMMC, and therefore good infection control procedures should be applied. This data set may act as a reference for monitoring erythromycin, tetracycline resistance among MRSA strains in Malaysia.


 ~ Acknowledgment Top


This work was funded by PPP grant (PV046/2011B) from University of Malaya, and PulseNet grant (57-02-03-1015) from JJID, Japan. KTL is supported by University of Malaya Fellowship.

 
 ~ References Top

1.Sam IC, Bador MK, Chan YF, Loong SK, Ghazali FM. Multisensitive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Malaysia. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 2008;62:437-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Wang Y, Wu CM, Lu LM, Ren GW, Cao XY, Shen JZ. Macrolide-lincosamide-resistant phenotypes and genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. Vet Microbiol 2008;130:118-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline Antibiotic: Mode of action, applications, molecular microbiology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Bio Rev 2001;65:232-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Martineau F, Picard FJ, Lansac N, Me'nard C, Roy PH, Oullette M, et al. Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:231-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Ng LK, Martin I, Alfa M, Mulvey M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes 2001;15:209-15.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Vali L, Davies SE, Lai LL, Dave J, Amyes SG. Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:524-32.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.De Vries LE, Christensen H, Skov RL, Aarestrup FM, Agerso V. Diversity of the tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) and identification of Tn916- and Tn5801-like (Tn6014) transposons in Staphylococcus aureus from humans and animals. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;64:490-500.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Lannergard J, Norstrom T, Hughes D. Genetic determinants of resistance to fusidic acid among clinical bacteremia strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:2059-65.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Twenty informational supplement. Approved standard MS100-S20. Wayne: CLSI; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.National Antibiotic Guideline 2008, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Available from: http://www.pharmacy.gov.my/aeimages//File/National_Antibiotic_Guideline_2008_edit(2). pdf, [Last accessed on 2011 June].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Spiliopoulou I, Petinaki E, Papandreou P, Dimitracopoulos G. erm(C) is the predominant genetic determinant for the expression of resistance to macrolides among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Greece. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:814-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.El-Mahdy TS, Abdalla S, El-Domany R, Snelling AM. Investigation of MLSB and tetracycline resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from the skin of Egyptian acne patients and controls. J Am Sci 2010;6:880-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Jones CH, Truckman M, Howe AY, Mark O, Mullen S, Chan K, et al. Diagnostic PCR analysis of the occurrence of methicillin and tetracycline resistance genes among Staphylococcus aureus strains from phase 3 clinical trials of tigecycline for complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2006;50:505-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Schmitz FJ, Krey A, Sadurski R, Verhoef J, Milatovic D, Fluit C. Resistance to tetracycline and distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in European Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;47:239-46.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Wiese N, Jones D. Intra-strains variability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains ST228-MRSA-I and ST5-MRSA-II. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;28:1383-90.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Schenk S, Laddaga RA. Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992;94:133-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Westh H, Hougaard DM, Vuust J, Rosdahl VT. Prevalence of erm gene classes in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated between 1959 and 1988. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:369-73.  Back to cited text no. 17
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from ready-to-eat food of animal origin – Phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance
Wioleta Chajecka-Wierzchowska,Anna Zadernowska,Beata Nalepa,Magda Sierpinska,Lucja Laniewska-Trokenheim
Food Microbiology. 2015; 46: 222
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from 12 Hospitals in Turkey
Ömer Yildiz,Ahmet Yilmaz Çoban,Asli Gamze Sener,Seher Ayten Coskuner,Gülçin Bayramoglu,Hüseyin Güdücüoglu,Mustafa Özyurt,Müserref Tatman-Otkun,Nihal Karabiber,Nuri Özkütük,Orhan Aktepe,Serkan Öncü,Ugur Arslan,Bülent Bozdogan
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 2014; 13(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Distribution of genes encoding tetracycline resistance and aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a burn center
Emaneini, M., Bigverdi, R., Kalantar, D.,Asadollahi, P., Taherikalani, M.
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters. 2013; 26(2): 76-80
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04