Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 2421 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (103 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  Acknowledgment
 ~  References
 ~  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2568    
    Printed121    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded246    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 382-383
 

An unusual presentation of Wuchereria bancrofti infection


1 Department of Microbiology, UFHT, Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital - 263 129, India
2 Department of Pathology, UFHT, Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital - 263 129, India
3 Department of Surgery, UFHT, Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital - 263 129, India

Date of Submission07-Feb-2009
Date of Acceptance02-Jul-2009
Date of Web Publication4-Sep-2009

Correspondence Address:
V Rawat
Department of Microbiology, UFHT, Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital - 263 129
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.55442

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Rawat V, Rizvi G, Sharma N, Pandey H. An unusual presentation of Wuchereria bancrofti infection. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:382-3

How to cite this URL:
Rawat V, Rizvi G, Sharma N, Pandey H. An unusual presentation of Wuchereria bancrofti infection. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Sep 17];27:382-3. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2009/27/4/382/55442


Dear Editor,

Bancroftian filariasis is widely distributed throughout the tropics and sub-tropics. [1] Despite the large number of people affected, it is unusual to find microfilaria in routine cytological smear and their recognition is generally considered an incidental finding. [2] We describe a case of a 45-year-old woman presented with a firm indurated sub-cutaneous swelling measuring 4 x 2.5 cm on the flexor surface of right arm [Figure 1]. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the swelling revealed straw colored fluid with large number of microfilariae on microscopic examination, identified as Wuchereria bancrofti because of the presence of hyaline sheath, cephalic space length: breath ratio was 1:1, nuclei were almost spherical, regularly placed, appeared in regular row, well separated without any overlapping and were absent at the tip tail [Figure 2]. We could not find adult worm or its segment in aspiration material. Subsequent identification on smear, night blood smear from patient failed to demonstrate microfilariae and blood eosinophil counts were within normal range (2%). Serum was collected and sent for antibodies detection in JB Tropical Disease Research Centre Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram. Indirect ELISA was performed which was highly positive for specific recombinant Wuchereria bancrofti filarial antigen (WL-L2). Swelling subsided after administration of diethylcarbamazine (100mg TDS) for 21 days.

Diagnosis of filarial infection is frequently made on strict clinical ground in endemic areas, but demonstration of microfilariae in circulating blood is the only means by which one can make definite diagnosis. [2] Similar to our finding, subsequent peripheral examination following cytological diagnosis did not reveal microfilariae [2],[3] suggest that filaria can exist without microfilaremia. Proportion of cases in endemic regions neither show microfilariae in blood, nor any symptom. [2],[4]

Blood eosinophil counts within normal range, as observed in our case, was also reported by Varghese et al . [3] However, Valand et al . [5] demonstrated eosinophilia in their case. These observations suggest that there is no consistent relationship between filarial infection and blood eosinophilia, which in turn reflects the difference in host response to parasite from person to person. Diagnosis of filarial infection by detection of antigen would obviate the problem in low level of microfilaremia, but such tests are available only in reference laboratory and are expensive. [1]

High index of suspicion is required to diagnose such unusual presentation of Wuchereria bancrofti . Careful screening of cytological smear can render definitive diagnosis of early, asymptomatic and clinically unsuspected cases of bancroftian filariasis, especially in those cases where microfilariae is absent in peripheral blood.


 ~ Acknowledgment Top


Authors are very thankful to Dr. MVR Reddy, Professor and Head of the Department Biochemistry and JB Tropical Disease Research Centre, MGIMS Sevagram for conducting the serological test.

 
 ~ References Top

1.Markell and Voge's Medical Parasitology. 9 th ed. Saunders Elsevier Publisher; 2006. p. 274-80.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Sivakumar S. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in detection of Microfilariae: Report of 2 cases. Acta Cytol 2007;51:803-5.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R. Microfilariae in cytological smears: A Report of six cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40:299-30.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Park K. Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 18 th ed. Jabalpur, India: M/S Banarsidas Bhanot Publisher; 2005. p. 211-6.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Valand AG, Pandya BS, Patil YV, Patel LG. Subcutaneous filariasis: An unusual case Report. Indian J Dermatol 2007;52:48-9.  Back to cited text no. 5    Medknow Journal


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04