|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 226-230
Characterization of RPO B gene for detection of rifampicin drug resistance by SSCP and sequence analysis
SS Negi, U Singh, S Gupta, S Khare, A Rai, S Lal
National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health and FW, Government of India, 22-Shamnath Marg, Delhi-110 054, India
|Date of Submission||10-Jul-2008|
|Date of Acceptance||20-Oct-2008|
|Date of Web Publication||4-Jul-2009|
National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health and FW, Government of India, 22-Shamnath Marg, Delhi-110 054
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: Because of the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in recent times, the rapid detection of resistance to the first-line anti-tuberculosis drug rifampicin was felt worldwide. Accordingly, this study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic potential of polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) for checking its utility as a rapid screening test for determination of rifampicin drug resistance. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( M. tuberculosis ) (22 rifampicin resistant, 11 rifampicin sensitive and one control H37Rv) strains were analysed by PCR-SSCP and DNA sequencing within the 157-bp region of the rpo B gene (Ala 500 -Val 550 ). Results: Rifampicin resistance was detected successfully by PCR-SSCP in 20/22(90.90%) of rifampicin-resistant strains showing a total of nine different mutations in seven codon positions: codon 513 (CAA→CCA), 516 (GAC→GTC), 507 (GGC→GAC), 526 (CAC→GAC, TAC), 531 (TCG→TTG, TGG), 522 (TCG→TGG) and 533 (GTG→CCG). Two rifampicin-resistant strains showed an identical PCR-SSCP pattern with the wild type H37Rv; 77.27% rifampicin-resistant strains showed a single point mutation and 9.09% had no mutation. Three rifampicin-resistant strains showed characteristic double mutations at codon positions 526 and 531. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 90.90% and 100%. Conclusions: Rifampicin-resistant genotypes were mainly found in codon positions 516, 526 and 531. PCR-SSCP seems to be an efficacious method of predicting rifampicin resistance and substantially reduces the time required for susceptibility testing from 4 to 6 weeks to a few weeks.
Keywords: M. tuberculosis, multidrug resistant tuberculosis, polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Negi S S, Singh U, Gupta S, Khare S, Rai A, Lal S. Characterization of RPO B gene for detection of rifampicin drug resistance by SSCP and sequence analysis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:226-30
|How to cite this URL:|
Negi S S, Singh U, Gupta S, Khare S, Rai A, Lal S. Characterization of RPO B gene for detection of rifampicin drug resistance by SSCP and sequence analysis. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Jun 3];27:226-30. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2009/27/3/226/45364
| ~ Introduction|| |
The rapid detection of resistance to first-line drugs such as rifampicin is essential for the efficient control of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) as rifampicin resistance was found to be an important marker for checking MDR in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , Although the period required for culturing is shortened by the BACTEC system, drug susceptibility testing in a liquid medium still requires 1-2 weeks for final reporting.
Rifampicin-resistant strains of M . tuberculosis evolve due to mutation in the rpo B gene encoding the β-subunit of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The resistance in more than 95% of the resistant strains is due to missense mutation or, less commonly, small deletions or insertions within an 81 bp rifampicin resistance determining region of the rpo B gene corresponding to codon position 507- 533. 
Various molecular methods have been applied to detect these unique mutations, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-mediated single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis, line probe assay and DNA sequence analysis. ,,,,,
PCR-SSCP analysis involves amplification by PCR of a segment of the gene encoding the specific drug target and comparison of PCR products of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant strains by SSCP in which mutations usually result in an altered pattern.  This technique is relatively simple and was promising initially, but recent studies have questioned its sensitivity and specificity. ,
In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the PCR-SSCP method to detect mutations in the rpo B gene of rifampicin-resistant and rifampicin-sensitive M. tuberculosis strains isolated inthe year 2006. The results were compared with sequencing with an aim to determine the codon most frequently involved and with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing.
| ~ Materials and Methods|| |
Thirty-three strains of M. tuberculosis (22 rifampicin resistant and 11 rifampicin sensitive), which were isolated at the Natinal Institute of Communicable Diseases using a conventional L-J media-based culture, were obtained from equal number of patients with active TB (strong clinical/radiological/histopathological evidence of TB) referred from different hospitals of Delhi, like Lok Naik Jai Prakash, Guru Teg Bahadur, Kalawati Saran Children, Rajan Babu TB hospital, in the year 2006. The sensitivity/resistance patterns of these isolates to rifampicin were determined by drug susceptibility testing by the proportion method using L-J media.  Briefly, the L-J medium with and without rifampicin (critical concentration 40μg/mL) was inoculated with 0.1mL of neat and 10−2 dilution of a McFarland 1.0 concentration of a suspension of each isolate of M. tuberculosis . The inoculated bottles were then incubated at 37° C for 6 weeks. Reading of the sensitivity pattern of the mycobacterial isolates was taken at 4 and 6 weeks. The break point was 1%, i.e., the isolate was considered susceptible to rifampicin if the number of colonies that grew on the drug containing media were <1% of the number of colonies that grew on the rifampicin-free media. An isolate was considered resistant if 1% or more grew on the drug-containing bottle. The H37Rv strain of M. tuberculosis was used as positive control strain.
A loopful of the colony was suspended in 400μL of 1X TE buffer [10mM Tris-HCl and 1mM ethylene diammine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 8.0] in a microcentrifuge tube. The sample was boiled for 10min at 100° C and then centrifuged at 13,000rpm for 5min. The supernatant was stored as a source of DNA at −20° C till further use.
The extracted DNA was amplified in a 25μL reaction mixture containing 11.5μL ddH2 O, 1.5μL MgCl2 , 2.5μL 10X PCR buffer, 200μM dNTPs each, 2.5U Taq Polymerase (GeneAmp (R) Gold PCR reagent kit; PE Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) and 5μL DNA. The primers were used in a concentration of 10pM each for amplification of the rifampicin-resistant region with primers TR 9 (5'-TCGCCGCGATCAAGGAGT-3') and TR 8(5'-TGCACGTCGCGGACCTCCA-3') (Gen Bank accession number L05910).  These primers generated a 157bp amplicon on 2% agarose gel. The reaction mixture was subjected to an initial denaturation at 94° C for 5min followed by 40 cycles at 94° C for 1min, 55° C for 1min, 72° C for 1 min and a final cycle at 72° C for 8min to complete the elongation of the PCR intermediate product.
The SSCP of the PCR products was analysed by electrophoresis with 12% acrylamide gels.  In brief, 10μL of the amplified PCR product was diluted with 100μL of buffer (0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate, 10mM EDTA). Ten microlitres of this dilution was mixed with 10μL of loading buffer (95% formamide, 20mM EDTA, 0.05% each of bromophenol blue and xylene cyanol). The mixture was denatured by heating at 98° C for 5min, cooled on ice and loaded on to the non-denaturing gel at 40V for 12 hours at room temperature. The gels were then silver stained and a photograph was taken. A control (H37Rv) sensitive strain was run alongside the clinical isolates. A change in the banding pattern as compared with the wild type H37Rv was taken as an indicator of mutation.
A 391bp fragment of the rpo B gene containing the sequence of the 157bp rpo B fragment was amplified by PCR using a primer having the nucleotide sequence as described elsewhere.  PCR was carried out in 25μL of a reaction mixture containing 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2 , 200μM dNTP, 1U Taq polymerase, 10pM of each primer and 5μL DNA. These primers generated a 391bp amplicon in the PCR reactions. The reaction mixture was subjected to an initial denaturation at 95° C for 5min, two cycles of 1min at 95° C, 30s at 64° C, 1min at 72° C, two cycles of 1min at 95° C, 30s at 62° C, 1min at 72° C, two cycles of 1min at 95° C, 30s at 60° C, 1min at 72° C, two cycles of 1min at 95° C, 30s at 58° C, 1 min at 72° C, 30 cycles of 1 min at 95° C, 30s at 56° C and 1min at 72° C followed by an additional cycle of 10min at 72° C. The 391bp PCR product was checked by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. The amplified product was purified and used as a template in the sequencing reaction using the cycle DNA sequencing kit (Applied Biosystem Inc, Foster City, CA, USA). The reaction mixture in a final volume of 10μL contained purified DNA (15-45ng), 3.2pM of either forward or reverse primer and 4 μL of the Terminator ready reaction mix supplied in the kit. The cycling parameters for the sequencing reaction included 25 cycles of 10s at 96° C, 5s at 50° C and 4min at 60° C. The sequencing PCR product was purified by sodium acetate-ethanol precipitation and then the purified product was loaded in an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer, Global Medical Instruments (GMI) Inc, Ramsey, MN, USA. The DNA sequencing identified mutation as specific base changes at the respective codon's position within the 81bp hypervariable region of the rpo B gene.
| ~ Results|| |
PCR-SSCP was performed on 34 strains of M. tuberculosis (22 resistant, 11 sensitive and one control H37Rv) with a fact that two denatured strands of DNA (in this case PCR amplified) adopt stable intra molecular conformations that may differ from the wild type on mutation. This causes a change in the electrophoretic mobility of the strands. The results of SSCP analysis of rpo B amplicons are summarized in [Table 1].
The results of SSCP analysis reveal that while most of the rifampicin-resistant strains exhibited mobility shifts correlating with point mutation, the finding of a three band SSCP pattern may reflect the presence of two possible conformations for one of the DNA strands or a reannealing band, but, in any case, it does not interfere with pattern recognition. 
On the basis of the SSCP results, 22 rifampicin-resistant isolates revealed 10 types of different band patterns [Figure 1]. Lanes 2-11 showed the SSCP pattern of the different resistant strains. All 11 rifampicin-sensitive strains had a PCR-SSCP pattern identical to H37Rv. Two rifampicin-resistant isolates had an PCR-SSCP pattern similar to that of the M. tuberculosis susceptible control strain H37Rv.
DNA sequence analysis of 20 out of the 22 resistant strains revealed 10 different kinds of missense mutations affecting seven amino acids within a 81 bp region of the rpo B gene [Figure 2]. Of the 22 sequences of rifampicin-resistant isolates, 17 strains showed a single mutation in the 81 bp core region and three strains showed double mutations at codon positions 531 ser and 526 His . Two rifampicin-resistant strains did not show any mutation/changed band pattern by either sequencing/SSCP. Highest frequency of mutation was observed in five rifampicin-resistant strains showing single point mutations at codon position 531 and four at codon position 516. Mutations were also found at codon positions 533, 522, 526, 507 and 513 by two, one, three, one and one strain, respectively.
| ~ Discussion|| |
Rifampicin is known to be a fast-acting bactericidal agent against M. tuberculosis and has greatly shortened the duration of chemotherapy.  However, rifampicin-resistant or MDR M. tuberculosis strains have become a newly emerging problem.  Because rifampicin resistance can be regarded as a possible marker of MDR, application of a rapid DNA-based assay would be a convenient method for suggesting drug susceptibility patterns. ,, Rifampicin resistance has been attributed to point mutations in the rpo B gene rather than to acquisition of a transposable element by M. tuberculosis . The point mutations can be easily detected on DNA sequencing of the resistant strains. These mutations can also generate unique intra strand associations in the ssDNA of the resistant mutants, leading to conformational polymorphism. These conformational changes can cause mobility shifts on the gel resulting in an altered band pattern, which differentiates between sensitive and mutant strains.
Keeping the above principle in mind, PCR-SSCP of 33 test isolates was carried out of which 11 were phenotypically predetermined to be sensitive and the remaining 22 were phenotypically resistant. We used an H37Rv rifampicin-sensitive strain as the control.
Eleven phenotypically sensitive strains showed the same characteristics, three bands coinciding with the bands of the control strain at the same position thus showing a 100% positive result whereas the phenotypically resistant strains, sample nos. 1-20, exhibited a band position displacement suggesting conformational change due to mutation.
The technique of PCR-SSCP is highly reproducible although it should be considered that differences in methods and protocols might produce a different banding pattern.
Irrespective of local differences, our data also demonstrated that SSCP analysis is highly specific and sensitive for detecting mutations in the rpo B gene in rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis strains. The sensitivity/specificity of this method was 90.90%/100%. Thus, this method can be considered as a reliable method for detection of mutations responsible for conferring rifampicin resistance.
The PCR-SSCP method detects only the presence and not the types of mutations. For this reason, PCR-SSCP analysis should be supported by DNA sequencing. In this study, the three strains (numbered 2, 4 and 6) showed double mutation, the first at codon position 526 His and the second at 531 Ser . The PCR-SSCP pattern of these strains was different from that of the strain with a mutation either only at Ser531 or His526 and from that of the one reference strain, H37Rv. In this study, two rifampicin-resistant isolates had a PCR-SSCP pattern similar to that of the M. tuberculosis -susceptible control strain H37Rv. These results may imply a mutation in another part of the rpo B gene or the existence of at least one additional gene that participates in rifampicin resistance. The sequencing result of this strain demonstrated no mutation in the 81 bp region. The mutation responsible for rifampicin resistance in this strain could be located either outside the region of analysis (such as codon 146) or changes that might have occurred in genes whose products participate in antibiotic permeation or metabolism. ,, This observation confirms an earlier report of a rifampicin-resistant strain identified in Australia with a mutation outside the core region of rpo B . 
We compared our PCR-SSCP result with the earlier published data. Earlier studies also showed that rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis strains have shown missense mutation, easily detected by PCR-SSCP, in a highly conserved region of the rpo B gene encoding Leu 511-Leu 533. ,,,,,, Isfahani et al.  showed 95.2% sensitivity by PCR-SSCP for detection of mutations in the rpo B gene. However, on the basis of the SSCP result of Miriam et al. ,  the 35 rifampicin-resistant isolates were grouped in to two main categories: group one, 24 isolates (68.6%) with an SSCP identical to that of the control strain H37Rv and group two, 11 isolates (31.4%) with an SSCP different from that of H37Rv. In their study, there were also 11 rifampicin-sensitive isolates that showed an SSCP identical to that of H37Rv. Lee et al.  assessed the molecular mechanisms of rifampicin resistance in clinical strains of M. tuberculosis . The molecular nature of a part of the rpo B gene in 77 M. tuberculosis clinical strains isolated in Korea was analysed using PCR-SSCP and PCR-sequence analysis. Among 67 rifampicin-resistant isolates, 50 showed SSCP profiles different from that of a rifampicin-sensitive control strain, M. tuberculosis H37Rv, whereas 17 resistant isolates displayed SSCP profiles indistinguishable from that of the sensitive control strain. This might be due to the presence of a mutation outside the amplicon.
After sequencing of the 81 bp region of the rpo B gene of the 22 rifampicin-resistant isolates, 17 (77.2%) strains showed a single mutation. Upon analysis of mutation frequencies, a majority of the mutations were found at codon positions 531, 526 and 516, corroborating the statement that these mutation are the most prevalent worldwide. ,,, This finding is comparable with the results of earlier studies demonstrating the rpo B mutation in different geographic areas. ,,,, Another characteristic finding was that of the double mutation occurring in two separate codons 526 and531 in three rifampicin-resistant strains, which again suggests that mutations of these two amino acids are the most frequent and are critically related to rifampicin resistance. In summary, our data and earlier studies on rpo B mutation frequencies supported the common notion that rifampicin resistance genotypes with mutations at critical codons, i.e., those encoding Ser531, His526 and Asp516 were most frequently detected in M. tuberculosis , regardless of the geographic origin.
We also analysed the cost issue parameter associated with the PCR-SSCP test. The currently available method for rifampicin drug resistance includes commercially available line probe assay (Inno-Li PA kit), mycobacteriophage-based assay, DNA sequencing and single tube heminested PCR assay. Each technique has its own drawbacks and advantages.  Although there are several advantages to the line probe assay, it is more expensive than the other methods and requires several probes for reverse hybridization to determine the mutation. Mycobacteriophage assay is still not standardized and thus not widely used. Heminested PCR uses signature nucleotides of M. tuberculosis to avoid amplification of DNA from other GC-rich bacteria. It is a powerful method to detect rpo B DNA of M. tuberculosis directly from sputum samples. However, when this method was applied to detect M. tuberculosis rifampicin resistance, further analysis such as sequencing or dideoxy fingerprinting after the amplification of the 193 bp rpo B DNA by heminested PCR was required. Sequencing is costlier than PCR-SSCP. Hence, because of the above said reasons, we found PCR-SSCP a better option for rapid and accurate detection of rifampicin resistance. The technique of PCR-SSCP could be applied to other targets such as detection of fluoroquinolone, pyrazinamide, streptomycin or ethambutol resistance.  Moreover, there is an ample opportunity for using PCR-SSCP directly on the clinical specimens. But the question is where and how these tests could be incorporated into routine use? Certainly there are settings where the rapid identification of drug resistance may be highly desirable and may prove to be cost effective. A primary example would be the urban population with a significant prevalence of MDR-TB and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection where data on the resistance genotype may result in better patient management and in more effective utilization of isolation rooms. However, we can say that although SSCP has a great advantage in reducing the time required for determination of sensitivity pattern from 6 weeks to 2-3 days, it is still limited by the requirement of extensive labour and a level of technical expertise not found in most clinical laboratories.
Overall, we believe that use of PCR-SSPC for rifampicin resistance may result in a net time gain of several weeks over conventional resistance testing.
| ~ References|| |
|1.||Isfahani BN, Tavakoli A, Salehi M, Tazhibi M. Detection of rifampin resistance pattern in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Iran by polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing methods. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro 2006;101:597-602. |
|2.||Siddiqi N, Shamim M, Jain NK, Rattan A, Amin A, Katoch VM, et al . Molecular genetic analysis of multidrug resistance in Indian isolates of M. tuberculosis . Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1998;93:589-94. |
|3.||Ramaswamy S, Musser JM. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Tuber Lung Dis 1998;79:3-29. [PUBMED] |
|4.||Ahmad S, Mokaddas E, Fares E. Characterization of rpo B mutation in rifampin resistant clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from Kuwait and Dubai. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;44:245-52. |
|5.||Kim BJ, Kim SY, Park BH, Lyer MA, Park IK, Bai GH, et al . Mutation in the rpo B gene of M. tuberculosis that interfere with PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism analysis for rifampin susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:492-4. |
|6.||Kim BJ, Lee KH, Park BN, Kim SJ, Park EM, Park YG, et al . Detection of rifampin resistant M. tuberculosis in sputa by Nested PCR linked single strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2610-7. |
|7.||Matsiota-Bernard P, Vrioni G, Marinis E. Characterization of RPO B mutation in rifampin resistant clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from Greece. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:20-3. |
|8.||Negi SS, Anand R, Basir SF, Gupta S, Khare S, Lal S. Role of Pab 38kDa antigen based PCR test in diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2006;124:77-84. |
|9.||Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Schmidheini T, Bodmer T. Direct automated detection of rifampin resistant M. tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:2054-8. |
|10.||Lee H, Cho SN, Bang H, Lee JH, Bae GH, Kim SJ, et al . Molecular analysis of rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolated from Korea by polymerase chain reaction single strand conformation polymorphism sequence analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:585-9. |
|11.||Miriam BV, Alfredo PL, Catalina AH, Gilberto VA, Midori KM, Peter MS, et al . rpo B gene mutations in rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis identified by polymerase chain reaction single-stranded conformational polymorphism. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:1010-3. |
|12.||Negi SS, Gupta S, Lal S. Drug resistance in tuberculosis in Delhi: A 2 year profile(2001-2002). J Commun Dis 2003;35:74-81. [PUBMED] |
|13.||de-Valle MB, Leon AP, Huertero CA, Alarcon GV, Maeda MK, Small PM, et al . rpo B gene mutation in rifampicin resistant M. tuberculosis identified by polymerase chain reaction single stranded conformation polymorphism. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:1-10. |
|14.||Kapur V, Li LL, Iordanescu S, Hamrick MR, Wanger A, Kreiswirth BN, et al . Characterization by automated DNA sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpo B) encoding the RNA polymerase B- subunit in rifampin resistant M. tuberculosis strains from New York City and Texas. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1095-8. |
|15.||Jin D, Gross CA. Mapping and sequencing of mutations in the E.coli rpo B gene that lead to rifampin resistance. J Mol Biol 1998;202:45-58. |
|16.||Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Lowrie D, Cole S, Colston MJ, et al . Detection of rifampin-resistance mutation in M. tuberculosis . Lancet 1993;341:647-50. |
|17.||Telenti A, Honore N, Bernasconi C, March J, Ortega A, Heym B, et al . Genotypic assessment of Isoniazid and rifampicin resistance in M. tuberculosis : A blind study at reference laboratory level. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:719-23. |
|18.||Heep M, Brandstatter B, Riegger U, Lehn N, Richter E, Rusch-Gerdes S, et al . Frequency of rpo B mutation inside and outside the cluster I region in rifampin-resistant clinical M. tuberculosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:107-10. |
|19.||Yuen LK, Leslie D, Coloe PJ. Bacteriological and molecular analysis of rifampin resistant M. tuberculosis strains isolated in Australia. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3844-50. |
|20.||Telenti A, Persing DH. Novel strategies for the detection of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis . Res Microbiol 1996;147:73-9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Rapid identification of mycobacteria and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by use of a single multiplex PCR and DNA sequencing
| || Pérez-Osorio, A.C., Boyle, D.S., Ingham, Z.K., Ostash, A., Gautom, R.K., Colombel, C., Houze, Y., Leader, B.T. |
| ||Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012; 50(2): 326-336 |
||Rapid detection of rpoB and katG genes from the sputum of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-direct sequencing analysis
| || Yang, S., Zhong, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. |
| ||African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2011; 5(26): 4519-4523 |
||Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Brazil: Phenotypic and genotypic methods
| ||Rosilene Fressati Cardoso, Fernando Augusto Fiúza de Melo, Marcelo Miyata, Fernando Rogério Pavan, Daisy Nakamura Sato, Leonardo Biancolino Marino, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata, Cleslei Fernando Zanelli, Clarice Queico Fujimura Leite |
| ||Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2011; |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|