Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 1277 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (163 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  Acknowledgments
 ~  References
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5058    
    Printed155    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded353    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 


 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 84-85
 

Writing pens as fomites in hospital


Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore - 575 001, India

Date of Submission10-Apr-2008
Date of Acceptance04-May-2008

Correspondence Address:
G K Bhat
Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore - 575 001
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 19172076

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Bhat G K, Singhal L, Philip A, Jose T. Writing pens as fomites in hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:84-5

How to cite this URL:
Bhat G K, Singhal L, Philip A, Jose T. Writing pens as fomites in hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Feb 24];27:84-5. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2009/27/1/84/45185


Dear Editor,

Healthcare-associated infections persist as a major problem in many hospitals. These infections are usually caused by multidrug resistant bacteria that are associated with much morbidity, mortality, and excess healthcare cost. [1] Although microorganisms are most commonly transmitted by the hands of healthcare personnel, materials and articles used in the hospitals could also carry microorganisms. [2],[3] We systematically studied bacterial contamination of pens used by healthcare personnel in intensive care units of a hospital and studied the duration of bacterial survival on pens.

Seventy-five writing pens used by doctors and nurses in intensive care units were collected aseptically and studied. Each pen was swabbed using a sterile cotton swab moistened with saline. The swab was then inoculated on blood agar and Mac Conkeys's agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24-48 hours. The plates were examined for bacterial growth. The bacteria were identified using standard methods. [4] Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria was tested using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Scientific Name Search  was detected by agar screen method using Mueller-Hinton agar containing 6 μg oxacillin/mL and 4% NaCl.

We also studied the extent of survival of S. aureus on three kinds of new pens - all metal pens, all plastic pens, and pens with rubber grip. Saline suspension of a clinical isolate of S. aureus adjusted to Mc Farland 0.5 standard (bacterial count 1.5 x 10 8 colony forming units/ml) was prepared and 0.01 ml of the suspension was smeared on the pens (five pens for each experiment). The inoculated pens were kept at 25 °C and examined for surviving bacteria at different time intervals. The pens were swabbed using sterile cotton swab moistened with saline. The swabs were inoculated on blood agar plate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and colony count determined.

Out of 75 pens studied, 26 (34.6%) were contaminated with bacteria [Table 1]. Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated from 16 pens. S. aureus was isolated from six pens, of which two were methicillin resistant. New pens were deliberately contaminated with S. aureus to determine the extent of survival of bacteria. S. aureus survived up to 48 hours on rubber grip pens, whereas the minimum duration of survival was observed on plastic pens and pens with metal body (24 hours and 18 hours, respectively).

Our findings indicate that the pens used by healthcare personnel in intensive care units can be contaminated with bacteria. This is in agreement with the findings of a previous study. [5] However, another group of workers could not show bacterial contamination of pens. [6] Several factors such as duration of usage, type of pen, number of persons using the pen may influence the rate of contamination of pens. We showed that S. aureus survives longer on rubber grips of the pens. Isolation of methicillin resistant S. aureus is a matter of concern. One critical aspect of bacterial transmission from person or from environment to a person is the ability of the microbe to survive on environmental surface. Careful use of pens and handwashing will help prevent transmission of bacteria from contaminated pens. Usage of pens with metal body may be encouraged in hospitals.


 ~ Acknowledgments Top


The authors thank the Dean, Chief Operating Officer, and all healthcare personnel who provided the used pens for the study.

 
 ~ References Top

1.Nathens AB, Chu PT, Marshall JC. Nosocomial infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1992;6:657-775.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Wong D, Nye K, Hollis P. Microbial flora on doctors'white coats. BMJ 1991;303:1602-4.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Chacko L, Jose S, Isac A, Bhat GK. Survival of nosocomial bacteria on hospital fabrics. Indian J Med Microbiol 2003;21:291.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal
4.Collee JG, Marmion BP, Fraser AG. Tests for the identification of bacteria. Mackie and Mc Cartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14 th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 131-50.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Datz C, Jungwirth A, Dusch H, Galvan G, Weiger T. What's on a doctor's ball point pen? Lancet 1997;350:1824.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Banerjee D, Fraise A, Chana K. Writing pens are an unlikely vector of cross-infection with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 1999;43:73-5.  Back to cited text no. 6    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Bacterial colonization on writing pens touched by healthcare professionals and hospitalized patients with and without cleaning the pen with alcohol-based hand sanitizing agent
Halton, K., Arora, V., Singh, V., Ghantoji, S.S., Shah, D.N., Garey, K.W.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2011; 17(6): 868-869
[Pubmed]
2 Physician accessories: Doctor, what you carry is every patientęs worry
Pandey, A., Asthana, A.K., Tiwari, R., Kumar, L., Das, A., Madan, M.
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2010; 53(4): 711-713
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04