Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 527 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (185 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  References
 ~  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2287    
    Printed55    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded423    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 398-399
 

Phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus


Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore-575 001, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission10-Jan-2008
Date of Acceptance21-Feb-2008

Correspondence Address:
G K Bhat
Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore-575 001, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.43564

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Bhat G K, Jathana L S, Kumar A. Phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:398-9

How to cite this URL:
Bhat G K, Jathana L S, Kumar A. Phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Aug 22];26:398-9. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2008/26/4/398/43564


Dear Editor,

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important nosocomial pathogen worldwide. It can also cause community acquired infections. Early diagnosis of MRSA infection is important to start correct treatment. The MRSA clinical isolates can be grouped into four phenotypic expression classes by population analysis profile. [1] In the heterogeneous phenotypes only a small proportion of the cells express resistance at high level whereas the majority are susceptible. The occurrence of heterogeneous resistance among MRSA contributes to their misidentification. The objective of the present study was to analyse methicillin resistance in nosocomial S. aureus by population analysis profile.

A total of 210 strains of S. aureus isolated from clinical specimen were used in the study. The isolation and identification of S. aureus was performed at the Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore. MRSA was identified by disk diffusion, agar screen and agar dilution method. [2],[3],[4] For disk diffusion, lawn culture of bacteria was prepared on Mueller-Hinton agar, 1 g oxacillin disk was applied and the results were read after 24 hours incubation at 35C. In agar screen method, bacteria were grown in nutrient broth at 37C for 24 hours and bacterial cultures (100 L ) were spot inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 4% NaCl and oxacillin 6 g/mL. Resistance was confirmed by the growth of bacteria after incubation at 37C for 24 hours. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin to S. aureus was determined by agar dilution method. S. aureus strains with MIC of oxacillin ≥4 g/mL were considered MRSA [3],[4] Population analysis profile (PAP) was determined using standard method. 11 Overnight bacterial broth cultures (bacterial concentration 10 9 -10 10 cfu/mL) were plated at different dilutions on Mueller-Hinton agar containing different concentrations (0.125-512 g/mL) of oxacillin and on oxacillin free medium (growth control). The plates were incubated at 37C for 48 hours and the number of colonies on each plate was counted.

Of 210 isolates of S. aureus , 69(33%) were MRSA by agar screen method and 59(28%) by disk diffusion technique. This is indicative of the superiority of agar screen method for the detection of MRSA. The MICs of oxacillin to S. aureus . were 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 and 512 μg/mL in 53, 38, 27, 23, 18, 4, 3, 17, 19, 4, 1 and 3 strains respectively. The present study clearly showed the unreliability of disk diffusion technique to detect MRSA. NaCl and low temperature (35C) usually favour the expression of chromosomally mediated heterogeneous methicillin resistance in S. aureus. [1],[5] The use of higher bacterial density and presence of NaCl in the medium may help in better detection of MRSA by agar screen method. MRSA clinical isolates can be divided into four phenotypic expression classes (1-4) by population analysis profile. [3] In MRSA class 1 phenotype, majority of the bacteria are methicillin sensitive (MIC 1.5-3g/mL) and minority (10 -8 -10 -6 ) have higher MIC values (50-100 g/mL). In class 2 phenotype, only 10 -5 -10 -4 cells have higher MIC values(200-400g/mL). MRSA classes 3 and 4 show homogeneous resistance with methicillin MIC usually >400 g/mL. In the present study three isolates showed oxacillin MIC 512 g/mL. The PAP could show heterogeneous methicillin/oxacillin resistance in 40 isolates. PAP of one strain of S. aureus is shown in the [Figure 1].

The PAP of MRSA strains showed that heterogeneous oxacillin/methicillin resistance that occurs may not be detected if one uses the routine disk diffusion test. This will result in an error (characterization of resistant isolates as susceptible) while reporting. The agar screen and dilution methods should be used for the reliable detection of MRSA.

 
 ~ References Top

1.Thomasz A, Nachman S, Leaf H. Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin - resistance isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:124-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Swenson JM, Hindler JA, Peterson LR. Special phenotypic methods for the detection of antibacterial resistance. In: Murray PR, Barn EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FE, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology, 7 th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 1999. p. 264-82.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Methods of dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacteria that grow aerobically: Approved standard M7-A7, ed 7, Wayne, Pa 2006, CLSI.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Laboratory detection of oxacillin/methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhap/arlabmrsa.html. [last 2005 Feb 2].  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Figueiredo AM, Ha E, Kreisworth BN, de Lencastre H, Noel GJ, Senterfit L, et al . In Vivo stability of heterogeneous expression classes in clinical isolates of methicillin resistant staphylococci. J Infect Dis 1991;164:883-7.  Back to cited text no. 5    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04