|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 361-364
Validation of multiplex PCR strategy for simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
S Rallapalli1, S Verghese2, RS Verma1
1 Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036, India
2 Department of Microbiology, International Centre for Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Diseases, Frontier Lifeline Pvt Ltd, Chennai - 600 101, India
|Date of Submission||02-Nov-2007|
|Date of Acceptance||12-Jan-2008|
R S Verma
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy is described for rapid identification of clinically relevant methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that targets mecA and coag ulase genes. In this study, 150 staphylococcal clinical isolates were used that included 40 isolates of MRSA, 55 isolates of methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 44 isolates of methicillin susceptible coag ulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MS-CoNS) and 11 isolates of methicillin resistant coag ulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MR-CoNS). Out of 55 S. aureus strains, three strains demonstrated mecA gene, which appeared to be oxacillin sensitive by disc diffusion. When (MS-CoNS) were evaluated, 10 isolates classified as oxacillin sensitive phenotypically, yielded positive results in PCR method. The results for mecA detection by PCR were more consistent with disk susceptibility tests in case of MRSA (100%) and MSSA (95%) isolates. In contrast to above results with MRSA and MSSA, mecA detection by PCR in MS-CoNS showed less correlation with disk susceptibility tests (77%). The results for coag detection by PCR were consistent with phenotypic tests in all isolates.
Keywords: Methicillin resistance, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, polymerase chain reaction, coag gene, mecA gene.
|How to cite this article:|
Rallapalli S, Verghese S, Verma R S. Validation of multiplex PCR strategy for simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:361-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Rallapalli S, Verghese S, Verma R S. Validation of multiplex PCR strategy for simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2020 May 25];26:361-4. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2008/26/4/361/43580
Methicillin resistant staphylococci are significant pathogens causing both nosocomial and community acquired infections. High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals has been reported from many states of India.  Methicillin resistance among S. aureus isolates has reached phenomenal proportions in Indian hospitals, with some cities reporting 70% of the strains to be resistant to methicillin.  In the last few years sensitive molecular typing techniques are leading the way to track the source and transmission route of bacterial pathogens. They have also helped in establishing epidemiological investigations and comparing strains across continents. Detection of mecA gene by PCR has been shown to be highly discriminatory in analyzing hospital outbreaks and tracking genetic changes which occur in a relatively short time. The aim of this study was to validate the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) technique in Indian isolates by which India specific data will be of immense benefit for the optimal application in our patients.
Beta-lactam antibiotics are the preferred drugs for serious S. aureus infections. Since the introduction of methicillin into clinical use, the occurrence of MRSA strains has increased steadily and nosocomial infections have become a serious problem worldwide. Indiscriminate use of multiple antibiotics, prolonged hospital stay, intravenous drug abuse and carriage of MRSA in nose are all important risk factors for MRSA acquisition.  In addition, MRSA infected patients require expensive and intensive isolation measures and strict hygiene. To date, the only standardized means of identifying methicillin resistance in the clinical microbiology laboratory are susceptibility tests such as disk diffusion, agar or broth dilution and agar screen methods. The performance of these tests has many drawbacks because factors such as inoculum size, incubation time and temperature, pH of the medium, salt concentration of the medium and exposure to beta lactam antibiotics influences the phenotypic expression of resistance. Rapid and accurate identification of S. aureus and its methicillin susceptibility pattern has important implications for therapy and management of both colonized and infected patients. Molecular diagnostic assays based on the detection of the mecA gene encountered difficulty in discriminating MRSA from methicillin-resistant coag ulase negative Staphylococcus species (MR-CoNS), because the mecA gene is widely distributed in S. aureus as well as in MR-CoNS.
In this study, we have developed and evaluated a mPCR method which allows the detection of MRSA by using primers specific for methicillin resistance and coag ulase genes. The purpose of our study was to set up a rapid and reliable identification procedure for MRSA through the amplification of specific gene determinants by PCR in order to efficiently support therapy and eradication of the pathogen. The coag gene was used to differentiate between S. aureus and CoNS, a gene which allows the species-specific identification of S. aureus . In addition, MRSA harbour the mecA gene encoding methicillin-resistance, which is absent in methicillin susceptible staphylococci.
| ~ Materials and Methods|| |
A total of 150 staphylococcal clinical isolates collected between the period 2005 to 2006 were used in this study (which includes reference strain of S. aureus ATCC 25923). These strains were all provided by the Department of Microbiology, International Centre for Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Diseases, Frontier Lifeline Ltd, Chennai. All the strains were clinical isolates from different specimens such as pus, blood, sputum and other body fluids. Identification of staphylococcal isolates was done by morphology, Gram stain, standard biochemical characteristics and susceptibility testing. S. aureus was identified by using standard tube coag ulase test.
Disk diffusion tests
The procedures routinely used in the clinical microbiology laboratories were employed for this study. The concentrations of oxacillin tested were 1µg/mL. Disk diffusion tests were performed with 1µg of oxacillin per disk placed on of Mueller-Hinton agar with 4% NaCl supplementation. The zone of inhibition was determined after 24 hours of incubation at 35°C. Organisms giving an inhibition zone equal to or lesser than 10 mm were interpreted as resistant to oxacillin. Organisms with a zone equal to or greater than 12 mm were interpreted as susceptible while those with an inhibition zone of 11-12 mm were interpreted as intermediate.
Bacterial genomic DNA isolation
Bacterial culture was grown overnight in nutrient broth and 2 mL of the culture was transferred into a microcentrifuge tube and spun for 2 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 567 μL of TE buffer to which 30 μL of 10% SDS and 3 µL of 20 mg/mL proteinase K were added, mixed gently and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Following this, 100µL of 5M NaCl was added and mixed thoroughly. After addition of 80µL of 10% CTAB-0.7M NaCl solution and the tubes were incubated for 10 minutes at 65°C. Equal volume of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added, mixed well and centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 10 minutes. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 10 minutes. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and 0.8 volumes of isopropanol was added, mixed gently until the DNA was precipitated. The DNA was washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 50 μL TE buffer.
Two sets of primers were used for the mPCR. The first pair of primers was derived from the region of the mecA gene , the forward primer corresponded to nucleotides 1282 to 1303(5' AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC) and the reverse primer was complementary to nucleotides 1793 to 1814(5'AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC). The second pair of primers was derived from the region of the coag gene , the forward primer was 5' CGA GAC CAAGAT TCA ACA AG and the reverse primer was 5'AAA GAA AAC CACTCA CAT CAG T.
Bacterial genomic DNA (aliquot of 1µL containing 50 ng of genomic DNA) was added to PCR mixture consisting ten fold concentrated reaction buffer (500mM KCl, 100mM Tris-HCl, pH 8·3), with final concentrations of 0.5 mM each dNTP, 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.15 µM of each coag primer and 0.1 µM of each mecA primer. This mixture was supplemented with 2U of Taq DNA polymerase. The final reaction volume for PCR was 20 µL. DNA amplification was carried out in an automated thermocycler (MJ Research PTC-200). After an initial denaturation step for 5 minutes at 95°C, 40 cycles of amplification were performed as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 30 seconds and DNA extension at 72°C for 90 seconds, followed by an additional cycle of 5 minutes at 72°C to complete partial polymerizations. Amplified products were analyzed using horizontal 1·5% agarose gel electrophoresis.
| ~ Results|| |
MRSA strains were unequivocally detected within three hours using multiplex PCR with coag and mecA gene-specific oligonucleotides. For MRSA strains, two discrete DNA fragments, a 533 bp mecA and 810 bp coag specific products were obtained. The mecA fragment was amplified in all the methicillin resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Amplification product was also detected for methicillin susceptible strains. The coag gene fragment was observed in all S. aureus strains, whereas such amplification did not occur in any of the CoNS. No non-specific background amplification products were observed.
The optimization of the multiplex PCR for this protocol was done by following the general principles.  Each pair of primers was first tested for amplification specificity annealing temperatures between 55°C to 60°C. For the multiplex PCR, we found it necessary to decrease the annealing temperature, increase the extension time and adjust primer amounts. These alterations were tested empirically in small steps. Reliable amplification of two bands was obtained for all strains tested when the final concentrations of the different primers were adjusted to 0.15 µM coag and 0.1 µM of mecA with 40 reaction cycles [Figure 1]. Due to incomplete amplification, virtually no band or very faint band of coag was observed with the lower concentrations for each of the four primers and with less number of amplification cycles [Figure 2]. On the basis of specific amplifications of the mecA and coag genes the multiplex PCR procedure allowed the specific identification of the staphylococcal species and the determination of its susceptibility to beta lactam antibiotics [Figure 3]
The results of the multiplex PCR amplification strategy are shown in the [Table 1]. For 40 strains determined as MRSA by phenotypic methods, the results were 100% consistent with PCR results. Interestingly, during the validation process we found there were three isolates that were classified as methicillin susceptible by the phenotypic methods in which we were able to detect the presence of the mecA gene by PCR. When MS-CoNS were evaluated, similar results were observed in which 10 isolates classified as oxacillin sensitive by disk susceptibility tests yielded positive results in PCR method. All these cryptic strains should be regarded as potentially methicillin-resistant isolates bearing the mecA gene and should not be classified as methicillin susceptible in spite of their susceptibility to beta lactam antibiotics.
| ~ Discussion|| |
For staphylococci, mPCR technique has been used to specifically detect MRSA. ,, These reports emphasize the fact that a positive result in DNA-based tests correlates well with the presence of the methicillin-resistant phenotype. PCR assays may detect microbial pathogens at concentrations below those of previously established gold standard reference methods. Distinguishing whether this result represents a false positive or false negative finding and establishing the clinical significance of these findings is a challenge. PCR assays for microbial detection may give false negative results because of relatively small sample volume permissible for PCR reactions. PCR methods in which the concentration of infectious organisms is low, the assay may yield false negative findings. To circumvent this, the methodology was modified in terms of DNA extraction, amount of DNA and primers used in mPCR amplification strategy.
Selection of primers for amplification of the mecA gene could have significant impact on the accuracy of test results. The position and G+C content of primers chosen for amplification of mecA may be critical to success when application is made to a large number of strains. In our mPCR strategy, nonspecific amplification of unrelated A+T-rich DNA regions was minimized by choosing primers containing -50% G+C and close to the variable region of the coag ulase gene. 
In earlier studies and in our present study, isolates classified as methicillin sensitive by susceptibility tests were found to harbour the mecA gene and accordingly should be reclassified as methicillin resistant. This could be because mecA gene is not consistently expressed and earlier evidence suggests that certain auxiliary genes such as femA and mecR may participate in control of its differential expression.  When we examined 40 isolates of MRSA, 55 isolates of MSSA, 11 MR-CoNS and 44 MS-CoNS isolates by MPCR strategy, the results for mecA detection by PCR were more consistent with disk susceptibility tests in case of MRSA (100%) and MSSA (95%) isolates. In contrast to above results with MRSA and MSSA, mecA detection by PCR in MS-CoNS showed less correlation with disk susceptibility tests (77%). Especially in case of MS-CoNS isolates, PCR results showing lesser consistency with those from susceptibility tests (60.9%) have been reported earlier.  This may be due to the fact that heterogeneous expression of resistance varies more for MS-CoNS compared to S. aureus and the subpopulation of resistant cells is smaller for MS-CoNS than for S. aureus .  These reports confirm that expression of methicillin resistance is more variable for MS-CoNS and the detection of the mecA gene is important in interpreting methicillin susceptible staphylococci.
Critical parameters for success of a PCR-based test are cost, reliability, speed and accuracy. We validated a more comprehensive mPCR protocol by simultaneously identifying two genetic markers that characterise the species and the antibiotic resistance mechanism. In our mPCR strategy, coag ulase gene was used as target which offers a better correlation between phenotypic and genotypic identification of S. aureus . Amplification of the mecA and coag genes in the same PCR tube allows a straightforward detection of S. aureus with detection of the methicillin-resistant phenotype. The absence of coag ulase gene product from CoNS sources demonstrates the high-level specificity of our PCR strategy. Many investigators have used PCR reaction mixtures of at least 50 µL. The small volume of the PCR reaction mixture employed by us (20 µL) reduces the consumable cost considerably.
In summary, the system evaluated here allows rapid recognition of the pathogen as well as genotypic detection of resistance to a specific drug. This information provided by a single multiplex PCR amplification can be helpful in choosing the right therapy and especially India specific data will be useful in designing larger prospective studies for preventing the spread.
| ~ References|| |
|1.||Rajaduraipandi K, Mani KR, Panneerselvam K, Mani M, Bhaskar M, Manikandan P. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus : A multicentre study. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:34-8. [PUBMED] |
|2.||Anupurba S, Sen MR, Nath G, Sharma BM, Gulati AK, Mohapatra TM. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary care Referral Hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Med Microbiol 2003;21:49-51. [PUBMED] |
|3.||Lu PL, Chin LC, Peng CF, Chiang YH, Chen TP, Ma L, et al . Risk factors and molecular analysis of community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:132-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|4.||Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH. Multiplex PCR: Critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. Biotechniques 1997;23:504-11. [PUBMED] |
|5.||Kearns AM, Seiders PR, Wheeler J, Freeman R, Steward M. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by multiplex PCR. J Hosp Infect 1999;43:33-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|6.||Mason WJ, Blevins JS, Beenken K, Wibowo N, Ojha N, Smeltzer MS. Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3332-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|7.||Vannuffel P, Gigi J, Ezzedine H, Vandercam B, Delmee M, Wauters G, et al . Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2864-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|8.||Shopsin B, Gomez M, Waddington M, Riehman M, Kreiswirth BN. Use of coag ulase gene (coa) repeat region nucleotide sequences for typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3453-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|9.||de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. Reassessment of the number of auxiliary genes essential for expression of high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38:2590-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|10.||Lan MO, Qi-nan W. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci using polymerase chain reaction. Int J Infect Dis 1997;2:15-20. |
|11.||Archer GL, Climo MW. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coag ulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38:2231-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Efficacy of Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng in a Murine Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin Abscesses
| ||Francisco Fábio Martins de Oliveira,Alba Fabiola Torres,Thially Braga Gonçalves,Gilvandete Maria Pinheiro Santiago,Cibele Barreto Mano de Carvalho,Milena Braga Aguiar,Lilia Maria Carneiro Camara,Silvia Helena Rabenhorst,Alice Maria Costa Martins,José Telmo Valença Junior,Aparecida Tiemi Nagao-Dias |
| ||Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013; 2013: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Biochemical characters and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates
| ||Subhankari Prasad Chakraborty, Santanu Kar Mahapatra, Somenath Roy |
| ||Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2011; 1(3): 212 |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Validation of multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection, identification of methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
| ||Jindal, N. |
| ||Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2010; 28(1): 82-83 |
||A community-based study on nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus
| ||Chatterjee, S.S., Ray, P., Aggarwal, A., Das, A., Sharma, M. |
| ||Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2009; 130(6): 742-748 |