|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 108-116
Onychomycosis - epidemiology, diagnosis and management
R Kaur, B Kashyap, P Bhalla
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002, India
|Date of Submission||27-May-2007|
|Date of Acceptance||06-Jul-2007|
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002
Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of nails caused by dermatophytes, yeasts or nondermatophyte molds and represents about 30% of mycotic cutaneous infections. Increasingly onychomychosis is being viewed as more than a mere cosmetic problem. In spite of improved personal hygiene and living environment, onychomycosis continues to spread and persist. The prevalence rate of onychomycosis is determined by age, predisposing factor, social class, occupation, climate, living environment and frequency of travel. Onychomycosis in immunocompromised patients can pose a more serious health problem. Dermatophytes are the most frequently implicated causative agents in onychomycosis. Previously regarded as contaminants, yeasts are now increasingly recognised as pathogens in fingernail infections, as are some moulds. Clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis is based on the patients' history; a physical examination, microscopy and culture of nail specimens. The treatment of onychomycosis has been attempted throughout the ages, but only in the last two decades have safe, effective systemic treatments been available for this chronic superficial fungal disease. Oral Griseofulvin and Ketoconazole; once the agents of choice for the treatment of onychomycosis, have been superseded by newer systemic compounds that have a higher cure and lower relapse rates, cause fewer side effects and are suitable for short-term dosing.
Keywords: Dermatophytes, diagnosis, nails, onychomycosis, treatment
|How to cite this article:|
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. Onychomycosis - epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:108-16
|How to cite this URL:|
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. Onychomycosis - epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2013 May 25];26:108-16. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2008/26/2/108/40522
Until the late 1990s onychomycosis was a poorly discussed topic of medical science. Even in financially more advanced Asian countries, onychomycosis has been highlighted only in the last decade. Onychomycosis is a denomination used to describe fungal infection of one or more of the nail units and can be caused by dermatophytes, yeasts or nondermatophyte moulds.  Onychomycosis affects approximately 5% of the population worldwide  and represents 20-40% of onychopathies and about 30% of mycotic cutaneous infections.  Various workers have reported the incidence to vary from 0.5 to 5% in the general population in India. , In developing countries, higher priorities in socioeconomic concerns and health issues for other diseases, have resulted in low awareness of onychomycosis by physicians and the general public alike. In spite of improved personal hygiene and living environment, onychomycosis continues to spread and persist. Though there is a clearly diseased appearance associated with this condition, onychomycosis is all too often regarded as merely a cosmetic problem of relatively minor importance that is hardly worth the effort to seek treatment in many cases. This belief may have been supported by the adverse effects and long dosing courses associated with some of the earlier antifungal agents. Only in the last two decades have safe, effective systemic treatment regimens been available for this chronic superficial fungal disease that can have significant negative effects on patients' emotional, social and occupational functioning. Although onychomycosis is rarely life threatening, its high incidence and prevalence and the associated morbidity makes it an important public health problem. In this paper, current knowledge of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of onychomycosis is reviewed.
| ~ Epidemiology and Risk Factors|| |
Reports concerning the prevalence of onychomycosis are conflicting with estimates ranging from 2-3% to 13% in the western population. , Unlike in western countries where it is the frequent cause of nail disorders, in Southeast Asia the prevalence of onychomycosis is relatively low. This was partially confirmed by a large scale-survey in Asia in the late 1990s in which the prevalence of onychomycosis was lower in tropical countries (3.8%) than in subtropical countries and the countries in the temperate zone (18%).  In India, the prevalence of fungal nail infections has been estimated in the different parts of the country and the observations are listed in [Table - 1]. The prevalence rate of onychomycosis is determined by age, predisposing factor, social class, occupation, climate, living environment and frequency of travel.  The prevalence is higher (25%) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV).  Several studies have shown that prevalence of onychomycosis increases with age, reasons for which may include poor peripheral circulation, diabetes, repeated nail trauma, longer exposure to pathogenic fungi, sub optimal immune function, inactivity or the inability to cut the toe nails or maintain good foot care.  As is the case among adults, prevalence rates for onychomycosis among children are quite variable: a recent review of studies of the subject in several countries lists prevalence rates varying from 0% (United states, Wales and Finland) to 2.6% (Guatemala). The reasons for this 30-fold decrease in the prevalence of onychomycosis in children relative to adults may include reduced exposure to fungus because less time is spent in environments containing pathogens; faster nail growth, smaller nail surface for invasion and lower prevalence of tinea pedis [Figure - 1].  However, the worldwide prevalence of onychomycosis is increasing. In one study that evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of onychomycosis in individuals representing different strata of population in New Delhi the prevalence of onychomycosis was confirmed in 45% of the analysed patients.  A number of factors may contribute to this rise. First, as the population ages, there is a corresponding increase in chronic health problems (diabetes) and poor peripheral circulation. Second, the number of persons who are immunocompromised because of infections with human immunodeficiency virus and the use of immunosuppressive therapy, cancer chemotherapy or antibiotics, continue to expand. Third, avid sports participation is increasing the use of health clubs, commercial swimming pools and occlusive foot wears for exercise.  In a small percentage of persons, onychomycosis may be caused by a genetic defect that causes an alteration in immune function.  Contact with the source of the infection constitutes a risk factor. Other factors that increase the risk of onychomycosis are direct trauma to the nail including nail biting. Onychomycosis in immunocompromised patients can pose a more serious health problem. Not only does the difficult-to-treat infection serve as a constant reminder to the patient of his or her own deteriorated condition, the possibility exists of transfer of fungal pathogens to other individuals. 
| ~ Definition, Etiology and Classification|| |
Onychomycosis has been traditionally referred to a non-dermatophytic infection of the nail but is now used as a general term to denote all fungal infections of the nail. Tinea unguium specifically describes a dermatophyte invasion of the nail. The term onychomycosis is derived from the Greek word "onyx", a nail and "mykes" a fungus. Toenails are about 25 times more likely than fingernails to be infected. The longest toe, either the first or the second, which bears the brunt of pressure and trauma from footwear, is particularly susceptible to invasion, although multiple nails are typically infected [Figure - 2].
Dermatophytes are the most frequently implicated causative agents in onychomycosis (nearly 90% in toenail and at least 50% in fingernail infections). Previously regarded as contaminants, yeasts are now increasingly recognized as pathogens in fingernail infections, as are some moulds.  The incidence and clinical significance of other than dermatophytic fungi or moulds causing onychomycosis is not well known, because they may be colonising organisms rather than pathogens. The rates of isolation of various fungi in onychomycosis are listed in [Table - 2]. One report, which presented the results of a two-year study, conducted to determine the incidence and aetiology of onychomycosis by nondermatophytic fungi in the population of Spain, described a number of species, such as Fusarium spp., Scytalidium spp. and Acremonium spp. etc. as aetiological agents of onychomycosis.  Nondermatophyte moulds cause 1.5-6% of onychomycosis.  Onychomycosis secondary to nondermatophyte moulds is seen most frequently in the elderly, in patients with skin diseases that affect the nails and in immunocompromised patients. It is more frequent in toes than in fingers. Many of these fungi are highly sensitive to cycloheximide and may be missed if the specimen is not also inoculated on a cycloheximide-free medium, such as Sabouraud glucose agar, Littman's Oxgall agar or potato dextrose agar. Clinical clues that a nondermatophyte mould is the causative pathogen may include the absence of tinea pedis, only one or two infected toenails, a history of trauma, a history of nonresponsiveness to systemic antimycotics and association with periungual inflammation.
There are three groups of fungi associated with onychomycosis: dermatophytes, non-dermatophytic moulds and yeasts.
| ~ Common Fungal Agents Associated with Onychomycosis|| |
- Nondermatophyte fungi:
| ~ Clinical Presentation and Patterns of Fungal Invasion in Onychomycosis|| |
Distal subungual onychomycosis
The most common variety of onychomycosis, distal lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO), is characterised by invasion of the nail bed and underside of the nail plate. It is best described as "nail bed dermatophytosis". The infecting organism migrates proximally through the underlying nail matrix. Mild inflammation develops, resulting in focal parakeratosis and subungual hyperkeratosis, with two consequences: onycholysis and subungual thickening. The nail bed becomes cornified and normal nail contour is lost. The thickened horny layer raises the free edge of the nail plate with disruption of the nail plate to nail bed attachment. DSO may develop on the fingernails, toenails or both. The dermatophytes predominate as causative agents with occasional involvement of the non-dermatophyte fungi. The commonest species of dermatophytes causing this type of onychomycosis is T. rubrum followed by T. mentagrophytes , T. tonsurans and E. floccosum . The ideal site for collection of specimen in DLSO is nail bed underside of the nail plate from the advancing edge, most proximal to the cuticle. DLSO may progress to total dystrophic onychomycosis in which case the entire nail plate and bed are involved.
Proximal subungual onychomycosis
This is also known as proximal white subungual onychomycosis (PWSO) or proximal subungual onychomycosis (PSO). A relatively uncommon subtype, PSO occurs when organisms invade the nail unit via the proximal nail fold through the cuticle area, penetrate the newly formed nail plate and migrate distally resulting in subungual hyperkeratosis, proximal onycholysis, leukonychia and destruction of the proximal nail plate. Fungal invasion of the proximal nail fold is often visible through the cuticle as a whitish yellow discolouration while the distal nail unit remains normal. Periungual inflammation may be quite marked and painful and in some cases associated with purulent discharge. These patients are frequently misdiagnosed as having bacterial infection. It affects the fingernails and toenails equally and is primarily caused by T. rubrum ; though T. mentagrophytes and other rare causes have also been reported to cause this condition. PSO has been described with increased frequency in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).  Toenails involvement is more common and T. rubrum is the most common pathogen. The explanation for the increased prevalence in this patient population remains unclear. The specimen is taken from nail plate and proximal nail bed as close to lunula as possible. Subungual hyperkeratosis, onychomadesis and eventual destruction and shedding of the entire nail plate may occur in advanced disease.
White superficial onychomycosis
White superficial onychomycosis (WSO) ; a less common variety, is a distinctive pattern in which the nail plate is the primary site of invasion. This is the surface infection of the nail primarily when the fungi invade the superficial layers of the nail plate directly and is caused by T. mentagrophytes and sometimes by the nondermatophyte molds like Acremonium spp., Aspergillus terreus and Fusarium oxysporum . It can be recognized by the presence of well-delineated opaque "white islands" on the external nail plate, which coalesce and spread as the disease progresses resulting in a rough, soft and crumbly appearance of the nail. Inflammation is usually minimal in patients with WSO because viable tissue is not involved. WSO occurs primarily in toenails. It may also be found in patients of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The surface scrapings of the nail plate are the ideal specimens to demonstrate the fungi.
Candida nail infections occur in patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and are caused by C. albicans in 70% of cases of onychomycosis caused by the yeast; C. parapsilosis , C. tropicalis and C. krusei account for the remainder of the cases.  Both toenails and fingernails may be involved [Figure - 3]. The organism invades the nail plate directly and has three subtypes:
Candida paronychia: This is the most common type and is marked by swelling and erythema of the proximal and lateral nail folds, also called a "whitlow". After infection of the nail matrix occurs, transverse depressions (Beau's lines) may appear in the nail plate, which becomes convex, irregular and rough and ultimately dystrophic.
Candida granuloma: This type is uncommon and is characterised by direct invasion and thickening of the nail plate and associated paronychia. This condition is seen in immunocompromised patients. The organism may affect the entire thickness of the nail, resulting in advanced cases, in swelling of the proximal and lateral nail folds until the digit develops a pseudo clubbing or "chicken drumstick" appearance. It is useful to take sample from both the nail plates as well as the subungual debris of the infected nail.
Candida onycholysis: This occurs when the nail plate separates from the nail bed. Distal subungual hyperkeratosis can be seen as a yellowish grey mass lifting off the nail plate. The lesion resembles that seen in patients with DSO.
Total dystrophic onychomycosis (TDO) : In this type there is total destruction of the nail plate, which usually may be the end result of the any of the four main patterns of onychomycosis. The entire nail unit becomes thick and dystrophic. TDO is used to describe end-stage nail disease, although some clinicians consider it a distinct subtype [Figure - 4].
| ~ Diagnosis of Onychomycosis|| |
Increasingly onychomychosis is being viewed as more than a mere cosmetic problem. Persons with unsightly infected nails may suffer embarrassment. Fungi from the nails may precipitate secondary bacterial infections, cellulitis, idiopathic reactions and chronic urticaria. Infected toenails may act as a reservoir for fungi, facilitating their transmission to other areas of the body and may even to other people.
Clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis is based on the patients' history; a physical examination, microscopy and culture of nail specimens. Predisposing factors like diabetes, old age, hyperhydrosis, onychoglyphores, nail trauma, poor peripheral circulation are likely to be present. Several nail disorders that may mimic fungal nail infections must be differentiated from one another and onychomycosis to initiate the most appropriate therapy. They include psoriasis, lichen planus, bacterial infections, contact dermatitis, traumatic onychodystrophies, paronychia congenital, nail bed tumours, yellow-nail syndrome, idiopathic onycholysis etc.
One should look for cutaneous signs of psoriasis on the scalp, gluteal folds, elbows and knees and nails should be evaluated for other signs of psoriasis, especially for pitting and/or small salmon coloured droplets evident on the plate. Approximately 10% of patients with lichen planus have abnormal nails. , A practitioner can differentiate lichen planus by looking for the violaceous purple papules ridged/dystrophic nail indicative of lichen planus on the extremities or by other signs on the mucus membranes. Repeated nail trauma can cause distal onycholysis, leading to colonization of the affected space by microorganisms that produce pigmentation of the area. If the onycholytic nail is clipped to allow examination of the nail bed, the latter will be normal if the symptoms are caused by trauma rather than onychomycosis. A habit tic, often manifestating as a median furrow or depression in the middle of the nail, may also cause abnormalities of the nail. The yellow nail syndrome may also be mistaken for a fungal infection; however, the hardness of the nail plate, its increased longitudinal curvature and the light green/yellow discoloration are all typical and discriminatory.
A proper specimen collection is essential for accurate diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy. The first step of the sample collection process is thorough cleansing of the nail area with alcohol to remove contaminants. Because the sites of invasion and localisation of the infection differ in the different types of onychomycosis, different approaches depending on the presumptive diagnosis are necessary to obtain optimal specimens.
For distal subungual onychomycosis, the abnormal nail is clipped proximally and the nail bed and underside of the nail plate are scraped with a 1-2 mm serrated curette; the outermost debris should be discarded. Care should be taken to avoid penetration of the nail plate and bleeding. It is important to obtain nail material from the advancing infected edge closest to the cuticle, where the likelihood of viable hyphae is the greatest. For proximal subungual onychomycosis, the normal surface of the nail plate is pared down with a no. 15 surgical blade at the lunula and the white debris is collected with a sharp curette from the deeper portion of the plate and the proximal nail bed. For WSO, the white spots on the nail are scraped and the outermost surface is discarded; the white debris directly underneath is then collected. For Candida infection, the material closest to the proximal and lateral nail edges should be obtained. If Candida onycholysis is suspected, the lifted nail bed and, if necessary, the under surface of the nail plate are scraped. For TDO, any abnormal area of the nail plate or bed can be used as a specimen.
The sampled material can be divided into two portions: one for direct microscopy and the remainder for culture. If nail material is to be used, fine shavings or minute clippings are preferred to large pieces. The specimen should be obtained when the patient has been off both topical and systemic antifungal drugs for two to four weeks. If the specimen is shipped to an outside laboratory, a sterile container, a pill packet, a clean sheet of white paper folded and sealed with tape or a specially designed mailer such as a Dermapak TM can be used. Specimens must not be kept in moist media to avoid rapid multiplication of bacterial and fungal spores. Ideally nail specimens should be processed within a week, although infective fungal elements can remain viable for months after specimen collection.
Both direct microscopy and culture of sampled material are necessary to definitive identification of the aetiologic agent. Whereas direct microscopy serves only as a screening test for the presence or absence of fungi; culture can actually help in differentiating among the pathogens and identifying the aetiologic agent. The clinician should be aware of the limitations of direct microscopy in diagnosing the cause of onychomycosis. Direct microscopy is often time-consuming because nail debris is thick and coarse and hyphae are usually sparse and there also exists a possibility of false negative results at a rate of approximately 5 to 15%.  The specimen can be mounted in a solution of 10 to 30% KOH or NaOH mixed with 5% glycerol, warmed to emulsify lipids and examined under 40x objective lens. An alternate formulation consists of 20% KOH and 36% DMSO.  The specimen may be counterstained with chitin-specific chlorazol black E to accentuate hyphae. Furthermore, it will not stain potential contaminants such as cotton or elastic fibres, which eliminates many false-positive findings. Parker's blue-black ink also can be added to the KOH preparation to improve visualisation, but this stain is not chitin-specific. Calcofluor white, a fluorescent dye that stains chitin in the fungal cell wall, can be used to enhance a standard KOH preparation. However, the use of this stain is not always practical in a clinical setting because a fluorescent microscope is required. The nail is examined for fungal hyphae or arthrospore. In Candida infections, yeast forms are also present. In certain nondermatophyte infections conidia may be formed in situ . Culture is the only method by which the causative microorganism can be identified. As nails are non-sterile; care should be taken with culture analysis as contaminants may obscure the actual pathogen.
Two different media are used for culturing nail specimens; primary medium (containing cycloheximide selective against most nondermatophytic molds and bacteria) such as dermatophyte test media (DTM), Mycosel (BBL) and Mycobiotic (DIFCO) and secondary medium (free of cycloheximide that allows isolation of nondermatophytes nail pathogens) such as Sabouraud glucose agar, Littman's oxgall medium and potato dextrose agar. The addition of antibiotics such as chloramphenicol and gentamicin to Sabouraud glucose agar or potato dextrose agar is an additional precaution to eliminate bacterial contamination from non-sterile sites. Ideally the specimen should be incubated at 25-30°C.
The incidence and clinical significance of other than dermatophytic fungi or moulds causing onychomycosis is unknown, because they may be colonising organisms rather than pathogens. Therefore, reference laboratories should provide data on whether the isolated fungus was a likely pathogen or an unlikely one. All dermatophytes should be considered pathogens.
To increase the predictive power of a diagnosis of dermatophytic invasion of a nail, Summerbell  suggested that non-filamentous non-dermatophytes identified in nail tissue may be considered as one of the following:
- Contaminant (species growing in culture from dormant propagules on the nails)
- Normal mammalian surface commensal organism
- Transient saprobic coloniser (coloniser of accessible surface molecules but non invasive)
- Persistent secondary coloniser (coloniser of material infected by a dermatophyte but incapable of remaining after the dermatophyte is eliminated)
- Successional invader (species that can cause infection after gaining entry into a nail via the disruption caused by a primary pathogen
- Primary invader (able to infect and cause onychomycosis in a previously uncolonised nail)
As an additional confirmatory technique, definitive identification of non-dermatophytic invasion in nails may require the isolation of the agent from successive specimens from the infected region.
The difficulty in isolating fungi from nail clippings in cases of onychomycosis because of the non-viability of the fungal hyphae in the distal portion of the nail plate from where the scraping is done is well known. In order to improve the isolation rate various methods have been derived. These include the use of a grinder  or a dental drill fitted with a suction nozzle,  which collects the nail dust for microscopy and culture. This latter instrument has raised the success rate of culture from microscopically positive nails from the usual reported rates of 50-75% to about 88%, but is not a practical procedure for the routine laboratory. 
If neither microscopy nor culture yields a diagnosis, histological analysis of pulverized nail plate clippings will determine whether the pathogen is a fungus. This procedure is helpful when the patient has a dystrophic nail that has repeatedly failed to show a positive response with potassium hydroxide or culture. Nail plate fragment can be sent in a 10% buffered formalin container for histopathologic analysis such as periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. PAS stains glycogen and mucoproteins in the fungal cell wall. In one recent study, PAS was found to be more sensitive than KOH preparation and culture alone (92% versus 80% or 59% respectively) and PAS staining plus culture had the best sensitivity overall.  Another advantage of histopathologic evaluation with PAS is the short time required to render a diagnosis compared to culture. Histopathology reliably demonstrates whether a fungus is invasive or merely colonising subungual debris but like KOH this preparation does not identify the particular pathogen. PAS stain is usually sufficient to demonstrate fungi; however, small serum inclusions may be mistaken for fungi, as they are also PAS positive. The methenamine silver stain (Grocott) and calcofluor white are more selective. Nail biopsy is the last resort.
| ~ Treatment of Onychomycosis|| |
As can be imagined, the treatment of onychomycosis has been attempted throughout the ages, but success has been limited until the current decade. In choosing therapy, the physician needs to consider the patient's age and health, the infecting organism, potential side effects and drug interactions of the various agents, the cost of treatment, the dosage schedule and patient compliance. As the rate of growth of toenails is one-third to one-half of fingernails, therapy of the former using the classical systemic drugs such as griseofulvin and ketoconazole must be continued for 12-18 months whereas fingernail infections may be cured in six months.
Oral griseofulvin and ketoconazole; once the agents of choice for the treatment of onychomycosis, have been superseded by newer systemic compounds that have a higher cure and lower relapse rates, cause fewer side effects and are suitable for short-term dosing.  Griseofulvin represented a promising advance in antifungal therapy when it first became available for clinical use nearly forty years ago. However, its effectiveness proved a disappointment, since its spectrum of activity is limited to dermatophytes and a prolonged duration of therapy is required for maximal efficacy-a period that may last for more than one year. Poor compliance with long-term therapy as a result of the side effects and the slow and incomplete clearance of dystrophic nails, led to success rates as low as 3-38%, with recurrence of infection often observed. 
Ketoconazole, developed in the 1980s, was the first orally active imidazole with a relatively broad spectrum of activity against dermatophytes, some yeast and several moulds. However, the long-term use of oral ketoconazole in onychomycosis, which is necessary to effect improvement or cure, is limited by the occurrence of side effects and significant drug interractions. 
The newer antifungal agents (itraconazole, fluconazole, terbenafine) block the ergosterol synthesis pathway at different points, a difference with implications for these drugs' efficacy and side effects.
Fluconazole, a triazole developed in the 1990s, is active against dermatophytes, Candida spp. and certain other fungi. Studies of fluconazole in onychomycosis show high cure rates but a need of long treatment time along with demonstration of some potentially significant drug interactions. 
Itraconazole, a broad-spectrum synthetic antifungal triazole approved in 1995 for the treatment of onychomycosis, represents an advancement beyond earlier therapies, due to its broad spectrum of activity, its high affinity for keratin and its pharmacokinetic profile. It is highly effective in the treatment of dermatophyte, yeast and some non-dermatophytic mould infections of the nails. Due to its rapid penetration into the nail and prolonged presence in the nail after discontinuation of drugs; Itraconazole has been evaluated in intermittent dosing or "pulse therapy" regimes which consists of dosing for one week (pulse) per month for a set number of months. 
The allylamine antifungal agent terbenafine is effective against dermatophytes and some moulds but has less activity in C. albicans infections. Results from several studies show that terbenafine has a high mycological cure rate and it significantly reduces treatment time over the older systemic agents. 
Regardless of which continuous oral antifungal agents the physician prescribes, a baseline liver profile and a blood chemistry study are recommended; however, this is not indicated for itraconazole pulse therapy.
Topical antifungal agents are of limited efficacy when used alone or with older antifungal agents to treat onychomycosis, but they may result in a more rapid cure when used in conjunction with the newer systemic compounds. They may also help to prevent the recurrence of tinea pedis, which often accompanies fungal toenail infections. Topical therapy has the greatest potential as primary therapy in mild infections, as palliative therapy in those unable to take oral therapy and as a prophylactic agent. Improvement of the conventional formulations led to the development of an alcoholic solution containing 28% tioconazole and undecylenic acid, for instance, which has produced moderate results.  A further step forward has been achieved with the development of new vehicles in the form of colourless nail lacquers known from cosmetic formulations. Two compounds, amorolfine and ciclopirox, are currently used in a lacquer base in several countries.
Surgical nail removal is not often used because of the discomfort, cost and possible cosmetic disfigurement. Avulsion of the nail combined with a topical antifungal agent, under occlusion, may be effective in selected patients. However, because of the inherent problems of nail avulsion, this is best limited to those with only one or two dystrophic nails and those intolerant of oral antifungals. Total surgical removal has to be discouraged: the distal nail bed may shrink and become dislocated dorsally. In addition, the loss of counter pressure produced by the removal of the nail plate allows expansion of the distal soft tissue and the distal edge of the regrowing nail then embeds itself. This can be largely overcome by using partial nail avulsion. Chemical avulsion, done by urea ointment, is a painless method that has superseded partial surgical avulsion.
Preventing recurrence and relapse
Even with apparently optimal diagnosis and treatment, one in five onychomycosis patients are not cured by current therapies. The reasons for the 20% failure rate are inaccurate diagnosis, misidentification of the pathogen, presence of a second disorder, characteristics of the nails, presence of a high fungal inoculum and/or drug-resistant microorganisms, compromised immune system of the host, diabetes mellitus or peripheral vascular disease.
Following are some suggested measures:
- Avoid going barefoot in public places
- Keep feet cool and dry
- Apply topical antifungal medication regularly to the feet and toe nails
- Discard old shoes and "rest" shoes periodically to decrease their exposure to fungi
- Apply an antifungal powder/spray to the inside of shoes once a week or more
- Comply with the treatment protocol
| ~ References|| |
|1.||Weitzman I, Summerbell RC. The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8:240-59. |
|2.||Murray SC, Dawber RP. Onychomycosis of toenails:orthopaedic and podiatric considerations. Australas J Dermatol 2002;43:105-12. |
|3.||Achten G, Wanet RJ. Onychomycosis in the laboratory. Mykosen 1978;21:125-7. |
|4.||Sobhanadri C, Rao DT, Babu KS. Clinical and mycological study of superficial fungal infections at Government General Hospital: Guntur and their response to treatment with Hamycin, Dermostatin and Dermamycin. Indian J Dermatol Venereol 1970;36:209. |
|5.||Karmakar S, Kalla G, Joshi KR, Karmakar S. Dermatophytosis in a desert district of western Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1995;61:280-3. |
|6.||Heikkalδ H, Stubbs S. The prevalence of onychomycosis in Finland. Br J Dermatol 1995;133:699-701. |
|7.||Elewski BE, Charif MA. Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other conditions. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1172-3. |
|8.||Bramono K. The Asian Achilles Survey. Presented in the 6 th Asian Dermatological Congress: Bangkok; November 2001. |
|9.||Williams HC. The epidemiology of onychomycosis in Britain. Br J Dermatol 1993;129:101. |
|10.||Ghannoum MA, Hajjeh RA, Scher R, Konnikov N, Gupta AK, Summerbell R, et al . A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: The frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:641-8. |
|11.||Havu V, Brandt H, Heikkilδ H, Hollne A, Oksman R, Rantanen T, et al . A double blind, randomized study comparing itraconazole pulse therapy with continuous dosing for the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol 1997;136:230-4. |
|12.||Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. A five-year survey of onychomycosis in New Delhi, India: Epidemiological and laboratory aspects. Indian J Dermatol 2007;52:39-42. |
|13.||Proceedings of the international summit on cutaneous antifungal therapy and mycology workshop. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:S1-116. |
|14.||Odom RB. Common superficial fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:S56-9. |
|15.||Midgley G, Moore MK, Cook JC, Phan QG. Mycology of nail disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:S68-74. |
|16.||Garcia-Martos P, Dominguez I, Marin P, Linares M, Mira J, Calap J. Onychomycoses caused by non-dermatophytic filamentous fungi in Cαdiz. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin 2000;18:319-24. |
|17.||Greer DL. Evolving role of nondermatophytes in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:521. |
|18.||Elewski BE, Rinaldi MG, Weitzman I. Diagnosis and Treatment of onychomycosis: A Clinician's Handbook. Gardiner-Caldwell Synermed: Califon, NJ; 1995. p. 5,7,13-24. |
|19.||Daniel CR 3 rd . The diagnoses of nail fungal infection. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1566. |
|20.||Elewsky BE. Onychomycosis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11:415-29. |
|21.||Summerbell RC. Epidemiology and ecology of onychomycosis. Dermatology 1997;194:32-6. |
|22.||Zaias N, Oertel I, Elliot DF. Fungi in toenails. J Invest Dermatol 1969;53:140. |
|23.||Daniel CR. Nail microcolonizer. Cutis 1985;36:118. |
|24.||Hull PR, Gupta AK, Summerbell RC. Onychomycosis: An evaluation of three sampling methods. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:1015-7. |
|25.||Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR, Najarian L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:193-7. |
|26.||Gupta AK, Sauder DN, Shear NH. Antifungal agents: An overview, part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:911-33. |
|27.||Elewski BE. Clinical pearl: Diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:500-1. |
|28.||Janssen Pharmaceutica. Ketoconazole package insert. Janssen Pharmaceutica: Titusville, NJ; 1997. |
|29.||Kuokkanen K, Alava S. Fluconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes. J Dermatol Treat 1993;3:115-7. |
|30.||De Doncker P, Decroix J, Pierard GE, Roelant D, Woesternborghs R, Jacqmin P, et al . Antifungal pulse therapy for onychomycosis: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of monthly cycles of 1-week pulse therapy with itraconazole. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:34-41. |
|31.||Tausch I, Brautigam M, Weidinger G, Jones TC; the Lagos V Study Group. Evaluation of 6 weeks treatment of terbinafine in tinea unguium in a double-blind trial comparing 6 and 12 weeks therapy. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136:737-42. |
|32.||Hay RJ, Mackie RM, Clayton YM. Tioconazole (28%) nail solution: An open study of it's efficacy in onychomycosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1985; 10:152-7. |
|33.||Mulay DN, Garg AK. A Study on the Trichophyton simii Infections in Man At Delhi. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1970; 36:176-81. |
|34.||Kaur IS. Incidence of Dermatophytosis in Chandigarh and Surrounding Areas. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1970; 36:143-46. |
|35.||Verma KC, Singh K. Dermatomycoses in Rohtak. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Leprol 1972; 6:238-42. |
|36.||Khalique A, Sengupta SR, Jhala HI, et al. Incidence and types of dermatomycoses in Aurangabad. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1974; 40:66-72. |
|37.||Reddy BS, Singh G, Sharma BM. Onychomycosis and nail dystrophy. Indian J Dermatol 1977; 23:1-4. |
|38.||Mehrotra HK, Bajaj AK, Gupta SC. Mehrotra TN, Atal PR, Agarwal AK. A study of dermatophytes at Allahabad. Ind J Pathol Microbiol 1978; 21:131-9. |
|39.||Prasad VB, Prakash APS Dermatophytic Profile of Chhotanagpur. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1979; 45:103-110. |
|40.||Maheswari Amma S, Paniker CKJ, Gopinathan T. Studies of dermatomycoses in Calicut (Kerala) (Clinical and Mycological investigations). Ind J Pathol Microbiol 1982; 25:11-7. |
|41.||Shukla NP, Agarwal GP, Gupta DK. Prevalence of dermatophytoses in Jabalpur. Ind J Pathol Microbiol 1983; 26:31-9. |
|42.||Dalal AS, Dhruva A, Mogra M, Mehra SK. Dermatomycoses in South East Rajasthan. J Ind Med Asso 1984; 83:197. |
|43.||Bannerjee U, Sethi M, Pasricha JS. Study of onychomycosis in India. Mycoses. 1990; 33:411-5. |
|44.||Urbanova D, Fragner P. Generalized candidiases verified through anatomical and cultivation methods. Acta Univ Carol [Med] (Praha). 1966; 12:41-65. |
|45.||Walshe MM, English MP. Fungi in nails. British Journal of Dermatology 1966; 78:198-207. |
|46.||Stevanovic DV. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Arch Dermatol 1967; 96:696-698. |
|47.||Krentel G. Fungal flora of the nails in consideration of Trichophyton megninii . Dermatol Monatsschr 1970; 156:627-34.[My paper] |
|48.||Liautaud B, Grosshans E, Basset M. Onychomycosis due to saprophytic fungi. Presse Med 1971; 79:1163-6. |
|49.||Grigoriu D, Grigoriu A. Les onychomycoses. Rev Med Suisse Romande 1975; 95:839-849. |
|50.||Bramono K, Budimulja U. Pathogenesis of superficial mycosis. Jpn Med Mycol 2005; 46:171-24. |
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in the Evaluation of Onychomycosis
| || |
| ||Mycopathologia. 2013; 175(3-4): 315 |
||Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a new valuable tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosis - comparison of six diagnostic methods : Six diagnostic methods for onychomycosis
| ||G. Rothmund, E. C. Sattler, R. Kaestle, C. Fischer, C. J. Haas, H. Starz, J. Welzel |
| ||Mycoses. 2012; : no |
||Antifungal susceptibility patterns of yeasts and filamentous fungi isolated from nail infection : Yeasts and filamentous fungi isolated from nail infection
| ||F.S. Ataides, M.H. Chaul, F.E. El Essal, C.R. Costa, L.K.H. Souza, O.F.L. Fernandes, M.R.R. Silva |
| ||Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2011; : no |
||Systematic review of nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis: Diagnosis, clinical types, epidemiology, and treatment
| ||Aditya K. Gupta, Chris Drummond-Main, Elizabeth A. Cooper, William Brintnell, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Antonella Tosti |
| ||Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2011; |
||Onicomicosis: estudio clínico, epidemiológico y micológico multicéntrico
| || |
| ||Revista Iberoamericana de Micología. 2011; |
| ||Welsh, O., Vera-Cabrera, L., Welsh, E. |
| ||Clinics in Dermatology. 2010; 28(2): 151-159 |
emonium Species: A Review of the Etiological Agents of Emerging Hyalohyphomycosis
| ||Shukla Das, Rumpa Saha, Sajad Ahmad Dar, V. G. Ramachandran |
| ||Mycopathologia. 2010; 170(6): 361 |
||Epidemiology of superficial fungal infections
| ||Ameen, M. |
| ||Clinics in Dermatology. 2010; 28(2): 197-201 |
||Arthrographis kalrae, a rare causal agent of onychomycosis, and its occurrence in natural and commercially available soils
| ||Sugiura, Y., Hironaga, M. |
| ||Medical Mycology. 2010; 48(2): 384-389 |
|| Prevalence of dermatophyte species in routine mycological tests at a private medium-sized hospital in Chapecó city, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil | [Prevalência de dermatófitos na rotina de micologia em hospital particular de médio porte na cidade de Chapecó, estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil]
| ||Schoeler, A.P., Sguissardi, C.H., Bernardi, E., Cembranel, L.R., Fuentefria, A.M. |
| || Revista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas Basica e Aplicada. 2010; 31(1): 103-106 |
|| Comparison of a new commercial test, Dermatophyte-PCR kit, with conventional methods for rapid detection and identification of Trichophyton rubrum in nail specimens
| ||Kondori, N., Abrahamsson, A.-L., Ataollahy, N., Wennerås, C. |
| ||Medical Mycology. 2010; 48(7): 1005-1008 |
||Antifungal agents for onychomycoses. | [Antifú ngicos disponiblesparaeltratamientodelasmicosisungueales]
| ||Carrillo-Muñoz, A.J., Tur-Tur, C., Hernández-Molina, J.M., Santos, P., Cárdenes, D., Giusiano, G. |
| ||Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia. 2010; 27(2): 49-56 |
||<i>Arthrographis kalrae</i>, a rare causal agent of onychomycosis, and its occurrence in natural and commercially available soils
| ||Yoshitsugu Sugiura, Masaki Hironaga |
| ||Medical Mycology. 2010; 48(2): 384 |
||The reliability of periodic acid-Schiff staining in the diagnosis of onychomycosis
| ||Singh, G., Lavanya, M. |
| ||Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2009; 75(1): 73 |
||Efficacy of fluconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis
| ||Brown, S.J. |
| ||Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2009; 43(10): 1684-1691 |
||In vitro response of cutaneous mycosis fungal agents to the most widely used systemic antifungals in dermatology | [Resposta in vitro de fungos agentes de micoses cutâneas frente aos antifúngicos sistêmicos mais utilizados na dermatologia]
| ||De Almeida, L.M.M., Souza, E.A.D.F., Bianchin, D.B., Svidzinski, T.I.E. |
| ||Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia. 2009; 84(3): 249-255 |
||Causative agents of superficial mycoses in Istanbul, Turkey: Retrospective study
| ||Koksal, F., Er, E., Samasti, M. |
| ||Mycopathologia. 2009; 168(3): 117-123 |
||Successful treatment of proximal white subungual onychomycosis with oral terbinafine therapy.
| ||Aman, S. and Nadeem, M. and Haroon, T.S. |
| ||Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP. 2008; 18(11): 728-729 |
||Evaluation of clinicomycological aspects of onychomycosis
| ||Kaur, R., Kashyap, B., Makkar, R. |
| ||Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2008; 53(4): 174-178 |