|Year : 2007 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 288-290
Disseminated nodular granulomatous perifolliculitis
S Das1, R Saha1, SN Bhattacharya2
1 Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi - 110 095, India
2 Department of Skin, VD and Leprology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi - 110 095, India
|Date of Submission||29-Nov-2006|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Feb-2007|
Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi - 110 095
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Nodular granulomatous perifolliculitis is a well-recognized infection of the dermal and subcutaneous tissue caused by dermatophytes, which normally do not invade beyond the epidermis. We report here one such case that occurred in an immunosuppressed individual. The patient was a 35-year-old farmer who presented with small pruritic eruption that had initially appeared on the lower leg and then had gradually spread to hair-bearing areas of the body, finally producing nodular and pustular inflammatory lesions with exacerbations and remissions. Fungal examination by direct potassium hydroxide mount and culture revealed Trichophyton rubrum. Granulomatous changes were seen on histopathological examination. The patient completely responded to systemic antifungal therapy.
Keywords: Granulomatous perifolliculitis, dermatophytes, immunosuppression
|How to cite this article:|
Das S, Saha R, Bhattacharya S N. Disseminated nodular granulomatous perifolliculitis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:288-90
|How to cite this URL:|
Das S, Saha R, Bhattacharya S N. Disseminated nodular granulomatous perifolliculitis. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 Oct 15];25:288-90. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2007/25/3/288/34779
Dermatophytes generally cause infection of the stratum corneum and superficial layers of the skin and thus, are rarely found in the layers deeper than the basal cell layer. However, Domenico Majocchi has described exceptions to this-either as small perifollicular papular form or a deep subcutaneous nodular form.  These are well recognized but uncommon dermal infections caused by dermatophytic fungi, occurring usually in individuals who have chronic dermatophytosis but maybe otherwise healthy. It may also occur in individuals with immunological disorders, in which case, systemic dissemination may sometimes occur.  In both the conditions, trauma leads to disruption of follicle (directly or indirectly). Such a passive introduction of the organism together with keratin or necrotic material into the dermis initiates the infection. Topical agents are ineffective therapeutically due to insufficient penetration of the drug into deeper layers of the skin, and thus, oral antifungal agents are required.  Here, we report a nodular granulomatous form with extensive dissemination in a patient from East Delhi, India, who recovered after a course of Terbinafine. Such cases have not very often been reported from this part of the country.
| ~ Case Report|| |
A farmer aged 35 years, resident of East Delhi, India, presented with a six month history of pin-head sized, itchy eruption starting from the right lower leg, which later spread to involve the left leg, thigh and back, especially the hair-bearing areas [Figure - 1].
On examination, multiple lesions, varying from inflammatory nodular to pustular, were seen all over the body. Some follicular pustules with perifollicular erythema and induration were also present on the lower abdomen. There was considerable scaling in these areas. The nodules were almost painless but occasionally tender. In these areas, the lesions progressed with occasional spontaneous remission and relapses. There was also associated fissuring of soles for the past 3-4 months. The patient had received a course of oral steroids (dexamethasone, 5 mg twice daily) for almost a year. There was no other clinical abnormality or disease. A provisional diagnosis of nodular perifolliculitis was made. Skin scraping and biopsy were taken from the patient's back, both lower legs, and the abdomen. Pus was obtained from the pustular lesions present on the back and legs. These were subjected to direct microscopic examination of 10% KOH mount followed by culture on standard Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) with and without chloramphenicol and cycloheximide. Growth obtained on SDA was identified on the basis of the rate of growth, texture, pigment production, and distinct morphological structures. Other physiological tests such as urea hydrolysis, growth on DTM (dermatophyte test media), and nutritional requirements were also performed. Baseline investigations, which included liver and kidney function tests and complete haemogram, were found to be within normal limits.
KOH examination showed thin septate non-pigmented fungal hyphae [Figure - 2]. Growth was obtained on the culture from all the specimens after incubation at 25°C over a period of one week [Figure - 3]. Lactophenol cotton blue mount of the culture isolate showed abundant hyphae and numerous teardrop shaped aleuriospores present along side of thin septate hyaline hyphae. Based on these morphological features as well as other physiological tests, the isolate was identified as a typical strain of Trichophyton rubrum . Histopathologically, hyperkeratosis with moderate lymphocytic infiltration in the papillary dermis was seen. There was mild spongiosis with lymphocytes and neutrophils in the epidermis. However, no fungal elements were seen on histopathology [Figure - 4]. A repeat biopsy with examination of several sections produced the same observation. Dexamethasone was tapered off gradually and the patient was started on terbinafine 250 mg twice daily. There was a marked improvement of the lesions with reduction of erythema and flattening of the inflammatory nodules. At the end of two months treatment, there were no residual clinical lesions and repeat KOH examination of specimens from earlier involved sites could not demonstrate fungal elements.
| ~ Discussion|| |
Disseminated nodular granulomatous perifolliculitis (a variant of Majocchi's granuloma) is typically described either as small perifollicular papular form or a deep subcutaneous nodular form.  It is commonly caused by dermatophytes, predominantly by T. rubrum . This is usually the most frequent cause of chronic dermatophytosis; however, T. mentragrophyte, T. violaceum, Microsporum audouinii, M. gypseum, M. canis and T. verrucosum may also be the causal agents. The follicular dermatophytic infection of the dermis, in immunocompetent individuals, usually occurs in women who shave their legs in an upward direction, perhaps driving fungal elements into the dermis. The deep subcutaneous nodular form, as in our case, is generally seen in immunosuppressed individuals and is characterized by groups of firm or fluctuant nodules occurring on scalp, hands, legs, etc. This may even clinically resemble recurrent bacterial pyoderma. The question is, what factors allow or contribute to the persistence and growth of dermatophytic fungi in an environment, which is markedly different from the superficial epidermis and subsequently predispose certain patients to nodular granulomatous reaction. It may either develop following a follicular disruption or passive introduction of the fungi into the dermis. The keratinous material present may penetrate into the dermis and act as a substrate for the survival of the organism. Thereafter, it sets in a chain of chronic granulomatous reaction characterized by epitheloid cells, small fungal cells, or occasional giant cells. In our case, the intense itching of the widespread lesions could possibly have led to deeper invasion by the organism. It is well documented that production of proteinases (keratinases) by T. rubrum leads to degradation and digestion of host tissue, and thus, contributing to deeper penetration of the skin by the organism.  Prolonged steroid intake reduces the cell mediated immunity and prevents an effective immune response thus predisposing the subject to chronic dermatophytosis.  Moreover, T. rubrum produces mannan (cell wall component), which has the ability to diminish the immune response that is far more potent than in other dermatophytes.  The property of T. rubrum to survive as spores and remain in stratum corneum can eventually lead to deeper tissue penetration. Conditions like malnutrition, leukemias, lymphomas, or immunosuppressive drugs can affect the function of polymorphonuclear leucocytes and macrophages, which are the defenses against invasion by dermatophytes. Physical barrier of the dermis, degree of hydration and lipid composition of the stratum corneum play a major role in preventing such dermal invasions.  However, disruption of such mechanism can allow the persistence and widespread dissemination of the agent.  Moreover, certain researchers have hypothesized that once dermatophytosis is established it can act as a source of immunosuppression on the host and further aggravate the existing infection.  It is also noted that under certain conditions, appearance of fungal cells in the dermis is prevented and may not be detected, as observed in our case.  It is also well documented that serum inhibitory factors  have a suppressive effect and may help to limit dermal invasion of dermatophytes. Our patient was on steroid therapy, and subsequently, when tapered off and treated with antifungal agents, the condition resolved. T. rubrum was demonstrable in all the deeper portions of the nodular lesions by culture methods, and histology suggestive of a granulomatous reaction was also seen. This evidently reinforced our previous diagnosis with an added element of dissemination. Hence, in such presentations, mimicking (bacterial) pyoderma, the fungal etiology should not be overlooked otherwise treatment with empirical antibiotics may subsequently result in dissemination due to the underlying fungal agent.
| ~ Acknowledgement|| |
We acknowledge the help of the Pathology Department, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital for reviewing the histopathology slides
| ~ References|| |
|1.||Wilson JW, Plunkett OA, Gregerson A. Nodular Granulomatous perifolliculitis of the legs caused by Trichophyton rubrum. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol 1954;63:258-77. |
|2.||Novick NL, Tapis L, Bottone EJ. Invasive Trichophyton rubrum infection in an immunocompromised host . Am J Med 1987;82:321-5. |
|3.||Gupta AK, Prussick R, Sibbald RG, Knowles SR. Terbinafine in the treatment of Majocchi's granuloma . Int J Dermatol 1995;34:489. [PUBMED] |
|4.||Gupta S, Kumar B, Radotra BD, Rai R. Majocchi's granuloma tricophyticum in an immunocompromised patient. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:140-1. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|5.||Weitzman I, Summerbell RC. The Dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8 :240-59. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|6.||Dahl MV. Suppression of immunity and inflammation by products produced by dermatophytes. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28:S19-23. [PUBMED] |
|7.||Blake JS, Dahl MV, Herron MJ, Nelson RD. An immunoinhibitory cell wall glycoprotein (mannan) from Trichophyton rubrum. J Invest Dermatol 1991;96:657-61. [PUBMED] |
|8.||Marsh TW, Artis WM. Host defence mechanisms and the superficial fungus infections. Dermatol Clin 1984;2:67-79. |
|9.||Sequeira M, Burdick AE, Elegart GW, Berman B. New onset Majocchi's granuloma in two kidney transplant recipients under tacrolimus treatment . J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:486-8. |
|10.||Sherwin WK, Rose TH, Rosanthal CM, Pertozzi JW. An immunosuppressive serum factor for widespread cutaneous dermatophytosis. Arch Dermatol 1979;115:600-4. |
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||First step in the differential diagnosis of folliculitis: cytology
| ||Murat Durdu,Macit Ilkit |
| ||Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2013; 39(1): 9 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Disseminated dermatophytosis in a patient with hereditary hemochromatosis and hepatic cirrhosis: case report and review of the literature
| ||Vincent C. Marconi,Richard Kradin,Francisco M. Marty,Duane R. Hospenthal,Camille N. Kotton |
| ||Medical Mycology. 2010; 48(3): 518 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Disseminated dermatophytosis in a patient with hereditary hemochromatosis and hepatic cirrhosis: Case report and review of the literature
| ||Marconi, V.C., Kradin, R., Marty, F.M., Hospenthal, D.R., Kotton, C.N. |
| ||Medical Mycology. 2010; 48(3): 518-527 |