Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 311 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (58 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  Abstract
 ~  Materials and Me...
 ~  Results
 ~  Discussion
 ~  References
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed11910    
    Printed322    
    Emailed28    
    PDF Downloaded808    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 33    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 49-51
 

Evaluation of different methods for diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria


Department of Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram - 442 102, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
D K Mendiratta
Department of Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram - 442 102, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.19895

Rights and Permissions

 ~ Abstract 

Rapid diagnosis is a prerequisite for institution of effective treatment and reducing the mortality and morbidity of falciparum malaria. This study was taken up to compare the efficacy of various rapid methods viz, acridine orange, Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein II antigen detection and Field's stain with traditional microscopy i.e., Leishman stain for diagnosing falciparum malaria. Thick and thin blood films of 443 consecutive patients with history of fever with chills and rigors were examined by Leishman and Field's method. Acridine orange stained wet mounts of blood were examined under fluorescence microscopy. All films were examined by two independent microbiologists. Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein II antigen was detected using commercially available kit, Paracheck Pf. Out of the 443 subjects examined for P.falciparum 18.28% were detected by Leishman stain, 6.32% by Field's stain, 18.28% by acridine orange and 18.1% by antigen based technique. Field's stain missed 53 (65.4%), while Paracheck Pf was negative in 6(7.4%) of the Leishman positive samples. All Field's stain and acridine orange positives were positive by Leishman, but five Paracheck Pf positives were negative. Leishman stain is cost effective but if facilities are available one should use acridine orange for screening. The antigen detection kits are rapid, simple and are useful but to rule out false negatives in clinically suspected cases, Leishman stain is reliable.


Keywords: P. falciparum, rapid methods


How to cite this article:
Mendiratta D K, Bhutada K, Narang R, Narang P. Evaluation of different methods for diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:49-51

How to cite this URL:
Mendiratta D K, Bhutada K, Narang R, Narang P. Evaluation of different methods for diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Dec 9];24:49-51. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2006/24/1/49/19895


Malaria causes 1.5 to 2.7 million deaths each year world wide.[1] It continues to be one of the major health problems in the developing world. The increasing incidence of falciparum malaria, the need to identify and treat the additional infective carriers (reservoirs) and to reduce the chances of transmission has given an impetus for development of simple and rapid methods for the diagnosis of falciparum malaria. Conventional Leishman, Giemsa or Romanowsky's stained peripheral blood smear examination remain the gold standard for diagnosis of malaria in malaria endemic countries. Conventional light microscopy has the advantages that it is sensitive, informative, relatively inexpensive, provides permanent record and can be shared with other disease control programmes. However, it suffers from disadvantages such as it is labour intensive and time consuming.[2]

In recent years, numerous rapid techniques like acridine orange (AO) stain,[3] quantitative buffy coat (QBC)[4] and detection of soluble histidine rich protein II antigen (HRP II Ag) in whole blood have been evaluated in an attempt to diagnose falciparum malaria as early as possible. HRP II antigen is released by erythrocyte infected with Plasmodium falciparum and Orchid Biomedical Systems (Paracheck Pf) and Span Diagnostics Ltd (Parahit) have developed commercial kits to detect this antigen by immunochromatography. However , previous studies have compared the sensitivity of these techniques (AO, QBC and HRP II Ag) individually with Leishman stain. In the present study, we compared these and Field's stain with the gold standard Leishman stain to evaluate their sensitivity in detecting falciparum malaria parasite .


 ~ Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted in the department of microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, between September 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004. One millilitre of blood in EDTA bulb was collected from 443 consecutive subjects who were clinically suspected to be suffering from malaria. The study was cleared by institutional ethics committee and written consent from the patients was taken prior to collection of blood.

Antigen detection

All samples were subjected to antigen detection using Paracheck Pf kit (Orchid Biomedicals Systems) as per kit instructions. The strip of this kit is coated with anti HRP II antibody and this detects the presence of the HRP II antigen by immuno-chromatography.

All kit components were brought to room temperature. The anticoagulated blood sample was mixed by gentle swirling. The sample loop was dipped in the sample and the blood so collected was blotted on the sample pad just below the rows on to the dipstick (approximately 5 mL of the whole blood specimen). The dipstick (arrows facing downwards) was then placed in a test tube containing four drops (200mL) of the clearing buffer, ensuring that the buffer level is below the blood sample for the entire duration of the test. At the end of fifteen minutes results were read as: negative for P.falciparum if only one pink band appeared and positive for P.falciparum if two distinct bands appeared. The test was considered invalid if no bands appeared and results were not read after 15 minutes.

Staining

Leishman and Field's method

Thick and thin blood films were prepared on four slides. Two slides each were stained by Leishman [4] and Field's stain.[4]

Acridine orange[3]

Seventy five mL of blood was mixed with 10mL of acridine orange stain on a glass slide and covered with a cover slip. The cover slip was pressed slightly and the preparation was examined under fluorescence microscope (exciter filter: LP 450 and barrier filter: LP 520). The ring stage, trophozoites and gametocytes appeared pale apple green under the fluorescence microscope.

All stained slides (Leishman and fluorescence) were screened by two microbiologists independently.


 ~ Results Top


There was 100% correlation in the interpretation of slides, both with respect to positivity and negativity, between the two microbiologists.

Of the 443 subjects, 18.28% (81) were positive for falciparum malaria by Leishman stain, 6.32% (28) by Field's stain, 18.28% (81) by AO and 18.1% (80) by Paracheck kit [Table - 1]. Field's stain failed to detect 65.4% (53) of the positives, while Paracheck method failed to detect 6(7.4%) cases [Table - 1]. All those positive with Field's stain and AO were also positive with Leishman stain, however Paracheck Pf detected five positives that were negative by Leishman stain [Table - 1]. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of AO with respect to Leishman stain was 100% [Table - 2]. The sensitivity of Field's stain was low (34.57%) but its specificity was 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of Paracheck Pf was 92.6% and 98.6% respectively with respect to Leishman stain [Table - 2].


 ~ Discussion Top


Rapid detection and effective treatment of falciparum malaria is a prerequisite in reducing the morbidity and mortality due to the disease. Leishman stained blood smear examination, which is the cornerstone in the laboratory diagnosis of malaria, has undergone little improvement since its inception. This is labour intensive and time taking and therefore delays diagnosis.[2]

In the present study, while comparing the available different methods of rapid detection of parasites with gold standard Leishman stain, the sensitivity of Field's stain was found to be the lowest (34.57%), which may be because of the undefined ring stage of the parasite. Modified acridine orange stain correlated well with traditional Leishman stain (100% sensitivity and specificity, NPV and PPV). Hemvani et al [3] found acridine orange (AO) to be better than Leishman stain as they detected 248 cases by AO against 148 by the latter. Acridine orange has the advantage that screeing is much faster. However, it requires a fluorescence microscope which is expensive and the AO stained wet mounts cannot be preserved, unlike the Leishman stained smear.

We also studied the usefulness of HRP II antigen detection kit Paracheck Pf for the rapid diagnosis of falciparum malaria. The sensitivity (92.6%) and specificity (98.65%) of this test kit observed in the present study was well comparable to that reported by many other authors (sensitivity 66-100% and specificity 98-100%).[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] However, Paracheck Pf was positive in five cases which were negative by Leishman staining. In retrospective case analysis of these five cases it was found that four of these never received any antimalarial treatment either for the present illness or in the past one month. Paracheck Pf was requested from them as routine to eliminate falciparum malaria infection, as they were suffering from fever. The fifth case (who responded to anti malarial treatment) probably had the parasite sequestered and this prevented its detection in peripheral blood smear by traditional method but HRP II could be detected by paracheck Pf.[10] One should bear in mind that HRP II has been shown to persist in blood for 7-14 days and up to 28 days[11] following antimalarial therapy, hence it is important to be familiar with the history of antimalarial treatment of the individual patient to rule out false positives. The six Paracheck Pf negative Leishman positive cases [Table - 1] were probably false negatives as ICT is unable to detect HRP II below 100 parasites/mL of blood.[12] The positivity of paracheck Pf depends on number of parasites per microlite of blood. Immunochromatography is unable to detect HRP II Ag when the number of parasites are less than 80 per mL of blood.[12] Christian et al[13] reported that if parasitaemia is more than 60 parasites/mL of blood, the dipsticks gave a sensitivity of 96.5 - 100% and this fell to 11 - 67% with 10 parasites/mL of blood. In the present study, six Paracheck Pf negative but Leishman positive cases [Table - 1] were in fact false negative by Paracheck Pf as the ICT kit was unable to detect HRP II Ag, the number of parasite per microlite of blood being low.

We also tested 50 samples with another HRP II Ag detection test kit (Parahit-Span diagnostics) and found its results to be the same as that of Paracheck Pf, however, the positive results with Parahit appeared within four minutes as compared to nine minutes by Paracheck. In addition, cost per test was less with Parahit dipstick test.

It is concluded that if facilities are available (equiptment and expertise) AO, should be used for screening. HRP II antigen detection kits are rapid, do not require expertise and can detect P. falciparum infection when the parasites are sequestered, hence, are useful in routine diagnosis (where cost is not a problem) and in emergency. However, there is need to confirm clinically suspected but HRP II negative, especially when level of parasitaemia is 60-80 parasites/ml or less.

 
 ~ References Top

1.Shiv Lal, Dhillon GP, Aggarwal CS. Epidemiology and control of malaria. Indian J Pediatr 1999;66:547-54.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.WHO. New perspectives: Malaria diagnosis;Approaches to the diagnosis of malaria, 2000;WHO/MAL.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Hemwani N, Chitnis DS, Dixit DS, Asolkar MV. Acridine orange stained blood wet mounts for fluorescent detection of malaria. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1999;43:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Chatterjee KD. Parasitology (protozology and helminthology) in relation to clinical medicine: 12th edn. (Chatterjee Medical Pub: Kolkata); 1980. p. 70-100.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Hemvani N, Mishra S, Mani T, Chitnis DS. Comparison of malarial antigen detection kits with fluorescent microscopy. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2003;46:150-1.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Shenoi UD. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1996;39:443-5.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.WHO. A rapid clipetic antigen capture assay for the diagnosis of falciparum malaria. WHO BULL OMS 1996;74:47-52.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Mills CD, Burgess DC, Taylor HJ, Kain KC. Evaluation of rapid and inexpensive dipstick assay for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Bull WHO 1999;77:553-8.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Schwenke S, Steidl S, Northdurft HD, Klein E, et al . Sensitivity and specificity of dipstick test for rapid diagnosis of malaria in non immune travelers. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:721-3.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Palmer CJ, Lindo JF, Klaskala WI, Quesada JA, Kaminsky R, Barum MK, et al . Evaluation of the Optimal test for rapid diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:203-6.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Shiff CJ, Premji Z, Minjas JN. The rapid manual parasightR-F test. A new diagnostic tool for Plasmodium falciparum infection. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 1993;87:646-8.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Garcia M, Kirimoama S, Mariborough D, Leafasia J, Rieckmann KH. Immunochromatographic test for malaria diagnosis. Lancet 1996;347:1549  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Beadle C, Long GW, Weiss WR, McElroy PD, Maret SM, Oloo AJ, et al . Diagnosis of malaria by detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen with a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay. Lancet 1995;343:564-8.  Back to cited text no. 13    


    Tables

[Table - 1], [Table - 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Use of a three-band HRP2/pLDH combination rapid diagnostic test increases diagnostic specificity for falciparum malaria in Ugandan children
Michael Hawkes,Andrea L Conroy,Robert O Opoka,Sophie Namasopo,W Liles,Chandy C John,Kevin C Kain
Malaria Journal. 2014; 13(1): 43
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling of secondary acute myelolytic leukemia
Manas Kumar Mukhopadhyay,Debjani Nath
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2014; 37(1): 378
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A novel live-dead staining methodology to study malaria parasite viability
Erica M Pasini,Denise van den Ierssel,Henri J Vial,Clemens HM Kocken
Malaria Journal. 2013; 12(1): 190
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A novel live-dead staining methodology to study malaria parasite viability
Pasini, E.M. and Van Den Ierssel, D. and Vial, H.J. and Kocken, C.H.
Malaria Journal. 2013; 12(1)
[Pubmed]
5 Performance of CareStart™ malaria Pf/Pv combo test for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax infections in the Afar Region, North East Ethiopia
Chanie, M. and Erko, B. and Animut, A. and Legesse, M.
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2012; 25(3): 206-211
[Pubmed]
6 Evaluation and comparison of hematological parameters between vivax and Falciparum malaria
Ranjini, C.Y. and Murgod, R. and Wilma Delphine Silvia, C.R. and Santosh, K.V.
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2012; 3(4): 1120-1128
[Pubmed]
7 Laboratory diagnosis of malaria by conventional peripheral blood smear examination with Quantitative Buffy Coat (QBC) and Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT) - A comparative study
Bhat Sandhya, K. and Sastry Apurba, S. and Nagaraj, E.R. and Mannur, S. and Sastry Anand, S.
International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine and Public Health. 2012; 4(10): 1746-1755
[Pubmed]
8 Seasonal performance of a malaria rapid diagnosis test at community health clinics in a malaria-hyperendemic region of Burkina Faso
Diarra, A. and Nébié, I. and Tiono, A. and Sanon, S. and Soulama, I. and Ouédraogo, A. and Gansané, A. and Yaro, J.B. and Ouédraogo, E. and Traoré, A.S. and Sirima, S.B.
Parasites and Vectors. 2012; 5(1)
[Pubmed]
9 Evaluation of "Cyscope", a novel fluorescence-based microscopy technique for the detection of malaria
Gwanzura, L. and Mayini, J. and Mabhanga, K. and Chipinduro, J. and Mashamba, K. and Mutenherwa, M. and Mutambu, S.L. and Mutsvangwa, J. and Mason, P.R.
Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2012; 6(2): 212-215
[Pubmed]
10 Incidence of malaria -three years prospective study
Kinikar, A.G. and Kulkarni, S.G. and Roushani, S.B. and Bhalerao, D.S.
Journal of Communicable Diseases. 2011; 43(4): 265-268
[Pubmed]
11 Correlation of quantitative Buffy Coat, blood smear and antigen detection in diagnosing malarial infection
Binesh Lal, Y. and Jayakumar, S. and Kalyani, M. and Mathew, R. and Shameem Banu, A.S. and Dhinesh, R.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(5): 961-963
[Pubmed]
12 Comparative study of peripheral blood smear, QBC and antigen detection in malaria diagnosis
Salmani, M.P. and Mindolli, P.B. and Peerapur, B.V.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(5): 967-969
[Pubmed]
13 Relative costs and effectiveness of treating uncomplicated malaria in two rural districts in Zambia: Implications for nationwide scale-up of home-based management
Chanda, P. and Hamainza, B. and Moonga, H.B. and Chalwe, V. and Banda, P. and Pagnoni, F.
Malaria Journal. 2011; 10(159)
[Pubmed]
14 Comparison of an immuno-chromatographic technique-based kit (Malaria card) with microscopy for rapid diagnosis of malaria in and around loni, Maharashtra
Gupta Ashok, K.
Journal of Communicable Diseases. 2011; 43(2): 121-125
[Pubmed]
15 Comparative study of peripheral blood smear and quantitative buffy coat in malaria diagnosis
Salmani Manjunath, P. and Mindolli, P.B. and Peerapur, B.V.
Journal of Communicable Diseases. 2011; 43(1): 57-59
[Pubmed]
16 Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostics for Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in Mae Sot Malaria Endemic Area, Thailand
Chaijaroenkul, W. and Wongchai, T. and Ruangweerayut, R. and Na-Bangchang, K.
Korean Journal of Parasitology. 2011; 49(1): 33-38
[Pubmed]
17 Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostics for <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> and <i>P. vivax</i> in Mae Sot Malaria Endemic Area, Thailand
Wanna Chaijaroenkul, Thanee Wongchai, Ronnatrai Ruangweerayut, Kesara Na-Bangchang
The Korean Journal of Parasitology. 2011; 49(1): 33
[VIEW] | [DOI]
18 Accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test on the diagnosis of malaria infection and of malaria - Attributable fever during low and high transmission season in Burkina Faso
Bisoffi, Z., Sirima, S.B., Menten, J., Pattaro, C., Angheben, A., Gobbi, F., Tinto, H., (...), Van Den Ende, J.
Malaria Journal. 2010; 9(1): art 192
[Pubmed]
19 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo rapid diagnostic test for the diagnosis of malaria in Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia
Mekonnen, Z., Ali, S., Belay, G., Suleman, S., Chatterjee, S.
Acta Tropica. 2010; 113(3): 285-288
[Pubmed]
20 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo rapid diagnostic test for the diagnosis of malaria in Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia
Zeleke Mekonnen,Solomon Ali,Getachew Belay,Sultan Suleman,Shyama Chatterjee
Acta Tropica. 2010; 113(3): 285
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv Combo rapid diagnostic test for the diagnosis of malaria in Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia
Mekonnen, Z. and Ali, S. and Belay, G. and Suleman, S. and Chatterjee, S.
Acta Tropica. 2010; 113(3): 285-288
[Pubmed]
22 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv Combo and Paracheck Pf® tests for the diagnosis of malaria in Wondo Genet, southern Ethiopia
Bekele Sharew and Mengistu Legesse and Abebe Animut and Daddi Jima and Girmay Medhin and Berhanu Erko
Acta Tropica. 2009; 111(3): 321-324
[Pubmed]
23 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo and Paracheck Pf tests for the diagnosis of malaria in Wondo Genet, southern Ethiopia
Shyama Bekele Sharew,Shyama Mengistu Legesse,Shyama Abebe Animut,Shyama Daddi Jima,Shyama Girmay Medhin,Shyama Berhanu Erko
Acta Tropica. 2009; 111(3): 321
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Rapid diagnostic tests for the home-based management of malaria, in a high-transmission area
M. L. Willcox,F. Sanogo,B. Graz,M. Forster,F. Dakouo,O. Sidibe,J. Falquet,S. Giani,C. Diakite,D. Diallo
Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2009; 103(1): 3
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Rapid diagnostic tests for the home-based management of malaria, in a high-transmission area
Willcox, M.L., Sanogo, F., Graz, B., Forster, M., Dakouo, F., Sidibe, O., Falquet, J., (...), Diallo, D.
Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2009; 103(1): 3-16
[Pubmed]
26 Evaluation of the performance of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo and Paracheck Pf tests for the diagnosis of malaria in Wondo Genet, southern Ethiopia
Bekele Sharew, Mengistu Legesse, Abebe Animut, Daddi Jima, Girmay Medhin, Berhanu Erko
Acta Tropica. 2009; 111(3): 321-324
[Pubmed]
27 Cost-effectiveness analysis of the available strategies for diagnosing malaria in outpatient clinics in Zambia
Chanda, P., Castillo-Riquelme, M., Masiye, F.
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2009; 7(Art 5)
[Pubmed]
28 Usefulness of Paracheck Pf test for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria | [Intrt du test Paracheck Pf pour le diagnostic de paludisme Plasmodium falciparum]
Boure, P., Alex, S.
Revue Francophone des Laboratoires. 2008; 38(399): 99-103
[Pubmed]
29 Performance and usefulness of the Hexagon rapid diagnostic test in children with asymptomatic malaria living in the Mount Cameroon region
Wanji, S., Kimbi, H.K., Eyong, J.E., Tendongfor, N., Ndamukong, J.L.
Malaria Journal. 2008; 7(Art 89)
[Pubmed]
30 Intrt du test Paracheck Pf pour le diagnostic de paludisme Plasmodium falciparum
Patrice Boure,Stphanie Alex
Revue Francophone des Laboratoires. 2008; 2008(399): 99
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Usefulness of Paracheck Pf® test for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria [Intérêt du test Paracheck Pf® pour le diagnostic de paludisme à Plasmodium falciparum]
Bourée, P. and Alex, S.
Revue Francophone des Laboratoires. 2008; 38(399): 99-103
[Pubmed]
32 Advances in malaria diagnosis
Michael Hawkes, Kevin C Kain
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2007; 5(3): 485
[VIEW] | [DOI]
33 Comparison of different diagnostic techniques in Plasmodium falciparum cerebral malaria
Shujatullah, F., Malik, A., Khan, H.M., Malik, A.
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. 2006; 43(4): 186-190
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04