Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 565 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (29 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
 ~  Abstract
 ~  Materials and Me...
 ~  Results
 ~  Discussion
 ~  References
 ~  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed20053    
    Printed404    
    Emailed34    
    PDF Downloaded884    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 28    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 249-252
 

Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases


1 Department of Microbiology, Grant Medical College and Sir J. J. Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai 400 008, India
2 Department of Surgery, Grant Medical College and Sir J. J. Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai 400 008, India

Correspondence Address:
S P Lilani
Department of Microbiology, Grant Medical College and Sir J. J. Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai 400 008
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16327121

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 ~ Abstract 

The rate of surgical site infections and the frequency of various pathogens causing surgical site infection with their antibiotic resistance pattern in general surgery units were studied. In the period from May 2001 to July 2002, 190 patients admitted for surgery (clean and clean-contaminated elective cases) were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Normal microbial flora was studied within 24 to 48 hours of admission and patients were followed up to 30 days postoperatively. Infected wounds were studied bacteriologically and clinically. The overall infection rate was 8.95%. Surgical site infection rate was 3.03% in clean surgeries and 22.41% in clean-contaminated surgeries. Significant increase was seen in surgical site infection rate with an increase in preoperative stay. The increase in duration of surgery was associated with a significant rise in the rate of surgical site infection. Surgical site infection rate was much higher (22.41%) in cases where a drain was used than in non-drained wounds (3.03%). The most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa .


Keywords: Surgical site infection, Clean and clean-contaminated surgeries, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa


How to cite this article:
Lilani S P, Jangale N, Chowdhary A, Daver G B. Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23:249-52

How to cite this URL:
Lilani S P, Jangale N, Chowdhary A, Daver G B. Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases. Indian J Med Microbiol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2017 Mar 26];23:249-52. Available from: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2005/23/4/249/17078


Surgical site infections are the third most commonly reported nosocomial infection and they account for approximately a quarter of all nosocomial infections.[1] They have been responsible for the increasing cost, morbidity and mortality related to surgical operations and continue to be a major problem even in hospitals with most modern facilities and standard protocols of preoperative preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis.[2] Surgical site infection rate has varied from a low of 2.5% to a high of 41.9%.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10]Objective of this study was to know the rate of surgical site infection and to determine the frequencies of various pathogens causing surgical site infection with their antibiotic resistance pattern in general surgery.


 ~ Materials and Methods Top


The present study was conducted on patients admitted for surgery in general surgery units of Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai. A total of 190 clean and clean-contaminated elective surgeries in two general surgery units from May 2001 to July 2002 were included in the study. The patients were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Normal microbial flora of all patients was studied within a period of 24 to 48 hours of the admission to the general surgical ward. The sites included nose, throat, axilla, skin (the site of operation), perineum, and rectum as recommended earlier.[11],[12]

Details that were recorded include the type of surgery by wound class (CDC, 1999), clean surgeries (Class I-operative wound) / clean-contaminated surgeries (Class II-operative wound), type and duration of operation, antimicrobial prophylaxis, drain used, preoperative hospital stay and total stay. Each patient was followed up from the time of admission till discharge from the hospital and also for 30 days postoperatively.

Surgical wound was inspected at the time of first dressing and weekly thereafter for 30 days. Wound infection was diagnosed if any one of the following criteria were fulfilled: serous or non-purulent discharge from the wound, pus discharge from the wound, serous or non-purulent discharge from the wound with signs of inflammation (oedema, redness, warmth, raised local temperature, fever > 38C, tenderness, induration) and wound deliberately opened up by the surgeon due to localized collection (serous/purulent). Stitch abscesses were excluded from this study.

Swabs obtained from infected wounds were processed aerobically and anaerobically by standard methods.[13] Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from infected surgical wounds were tested for β -lactamase production and also for methicillin resistance. Staphylococcus aureus strains were sent for phage typing to National Reference Centre for Staphylococcal Phage Typing, Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. Data were evaluated by chi square (X2 statistical test. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.


 ~ Results Top


Out of total 190 patients, majority (57) were operated for inguinal hernia followed by operations for hydrocele (27), 132 (69.47%) were clean surgeries and 58 (30.53%) were clean-contaminated surgeries.

Of the total 190 patients included in this study, 17 developed surgical site infection with the overall infection rate of 8.95%. Surgical site infection rate was 3.03% in clean surgeries and 22.41% in clean-contaminated surgeries [Table - 1]. The difference was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0012). In clean surgeries, maximum infection rate was seen in mastectomies (25%) for breast malignancy, while patients with surgeries for hydrocele, fibroadenoma breast, thyroid and parathyroid had no surgical site infection [Table - 2]. In clean-contaminated surgeries, infection rate doubled in patients with surgeries for lower urinary tract and genital tract (25%) as compared to those with upper urinary tract surgeries (12.5%). In addition, surgical site infection rate was very high in cases of thoracotomies (44.44%). Two patients who underwent large bowel surgery, developed postoperative wound infection [Table - 2].

None of the patients who were operated within the first two days of admission to the ward had surgical site infection. The incidence of surgical site infection increased with increase in the duration of preoperative stay, and the difference was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0034).

There was no infection in surgeries lasting for less than 30 minutes. Infection rate was low (1.47%) for operations lasting for 30 minutes to less than an hour, while surgical site infection rate was high (38.46%) for operations that lasted for 120 minutes or more. The increase in the rate was statistically significant (P = 0.0021). Wound infection rate was much higher (22.41%) in cases where drain was used than in non-drained wounds (3.03%). The difference in infection rates was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.00016).

Three of 17 infected wounds were culture negative. From the remaining 14 infected wounds, total 16 isolates were recovered [Table - 3]. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest isolate followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa .

All the six  S.aureus Scientific Name Search  strains were resistant to penicillin. Five out of six stains were positive for β -lactamase and two were methicillin resistant (MRSA) S.aureus was isolated from six infected wounds [Table - 3]. In one patient, two S.aureus strains were isolated, one from the infected wound postoperatively and other from the axilla during preoperative normal flora surveillance. These two were having same antibiogram and belonged to the same phage type (type 80). In remaining five patients with S.aureus wound infection, S.aureus was not found at any of the normal flora sites during preoperative surveillance.

Similarly,  Escherichia More Details coli isolated from one of the patients infected wound postoperatively, and also from his perineum and rectum preoperatively as a normal flora, revealed similar antibiograms.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited 100% resistance to gentamicin. Other gram negative bacilli were found to be most resistant (100%) to tetracycline followed by ampicillin and cephalothin (83.33% each).

The mean postoperative stay, in patients who did not develop any surgical site infection, was 6.19 days, whereas the mean postoperative stay increased four times (24.82 days) in 17 patients, who developed surgical site infection.


 ~ Discussion Top


The surgical site infection rate reports by different workers have differed considerably. The overall infection rate in the present study was 8.95% and compares favourably with other reported rates ranging from 2.5 to 41.9 %.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10]

Number of studies carried out in India indicate an overall infection rate of 4.04 to 30% for clean surgeries and 10.06 to 45% for clean-contaminated surgeries.[5],[7],[10] Findings in the present study show that there is significant rise in infection rate with increased degree of operative contamination; rate of infection for clean surgeries was 3.03% while in clean-contaminated surgeries it was 22.41%.

A prolonged preoperative stay with exposure to hospital environment and its ubiquitous diagnostic procedures, therapies and microflora have been shown to increase the rate of surgical site infection.[14] Kowli et al found an infection rate of 17.4% when preoperative stay was 0-7 days and an infection rate of 71.4% with a preoperative stay of more than 21 days.[8] Anvikar et al (1999), in their study demonstrated an infection rate of 1.76% when preoperative stay was upto one day, which increased to 5.0% when the preoperative stay was more than one week.[10] In the present study, correlation was seen between duration of preoperative hospitalization and the development of surgical site infection. Significant increase in rate of surgical site infection was found in patients who had prolonged stay in hospital before the surgery.

It has been observed that wound infection rate is influenced by duration of operation.[3], [5],[6],[7],[8],[10] The findings of the present study are in agreement with the reported literature. With increase in duration of surgery, the rate of infection increased in direct proportion. The results were found to be statistically significant. Higher surgical site infection rates have been noted for drained wounds as compared to non-drained wounds as was observed in this study.[3],[7]

Many studies have reported Staphylococcus aureus as the commonest isolate from the postoperative wound infection.[1],[9],[15] In the present study, predominance of Staphylococcus aureus in surgical site infection is consistent with reports from other studies. Among gram negative bacilli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the commonest isolate in the present study. Based on the type of surgical procedure, the pathogens that are isolated from surgical site infection vary. It is found that in clean surgical procedures, Staphylococcus aureus from the exogenous environment or the patient's skin flora is the usual pathogen, whereas, in other categories of surgical procedures, including clean-contaminated, contaminated and dirty, the polymicrobial flora closely resembling the normal endogenous microflora of the surgically resected organ are the most frequently isolated pathogens.[16] In the present study gram negative bacilli were predominantly isolated from clean-contaminated surgeries, while none of the infected wounds in clean class yielded gram negative bacilli.

Number of studies in the literature indicate gradual increase in the emergence of antibiotic resistant microorganisms in surgical patients.[4],[5],[8],[10] Special interest in Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection is mainly due to its predominant role in hospital cross infection and emergence of virulent antibiotic resistant strains. In the present study, all Staphylococcus aureus strains from the infected wound were resistant to penicillin. Ineffectiveness of penicillin in Staphylococcus aureus has been reported in other studies also.[4],[5],[10] Two out of six (33.33%) strains of Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin-resistant but none of the strains was resistant to vancomycin. All strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistant to gentamicin, which was one of the antibiotics used for antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Prolonged postoperative hospitalization, which is a major concern of most of the hospitals, has been evident in patients developing surgical site infection.[6] In the present study, mean postoperative stay in patients who developed infection was almost four times (24.82 days) as compared to patients who did not develop surgical site infection where the mean postoperative stay was 6.19 days.

Though the exact increase in patient-care cost due to prolonged postoperative hospital stay could not be calculated, it is a cause of concern for any hospital. Surveillance of surgical site infection with feedback of appropriate data to surgeons would be desirable to reduce the surgical site infection rate.



 
 ~ References Top

1.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20 :247-78.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Yalcin AN, Bakir M, Bakici Z, Dokmetas I, Sabir N. Postoperative wound infections. J Hosp Infect 1995; 29 :305-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Berard F, Gandon J. Postoperative wound infections: The influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg 1964; 160 :1-132.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Agarwal SL. Study of postoperative wound infection. Indian J Surg 1972; 34 :314-20.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Rao AS, Harsha M. Postoperative wound infections. J Indian Med Assoc 1975; 64 :90-3.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Cruse Peter JE, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60 :27-40.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Tripathy BS, Roy N. Post-operative wound sepsis. Indian J Surg 1984; 47 :285-8.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Kowli SS, Nayak MH, Mehta AP, Bhalerao RA. Hospital infection. Indian J Surg 1985; 48 :475-86.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Olson MM, Lee JT. Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990; 125 :794-803.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Anvikar AR, Deshmukh AB, Karyakarte RP, Damle AS, Patwardhan NS, Malik AK, et al . A one year prospective study of 3,280 surgical wounds. Indian J Med Microbiol 1999; 17 :129-32.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Donald AG, Sylvia JB. Group C streptococcal surgical wound infections transmitted by an anorectal and nasal carrier. Arch Surg 1977; 39 :235-7.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12. In : Shanson DC, eds. Microbiology in Clinical Practice . 3rd Ed. Butterworth and Co. Publishers: UK; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13. In : Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Jr, editors. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology . 5th Ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers: Philadelphia: Pa; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Hummel RP. Surgical considerations of endogenous infectious - sources, types and methods of control. Surg Clin North Am 1968; 48 :227-40.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Prabhakar H, Arora S. A bacteriological study of wound infections. J Indian Med Assoc 1979; 73 :145-8.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Nichols RL. Surgical wound infection. Am J Med 1991; 91 :54S-63S.  Back to cited text no. 16    


Tables

[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Emergence of coryneform bacteria as pathogens in nosocomial surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital of North India
Rizvi, M. and Rizvi, M.W. and Shaheen and Sultan, A. and Khan, F. and Shukla, I. and Malik, A.
Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2013; 6(4): 283-288
[Pubmed]
2 A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection
Reiffel, A.J. and Barie, P.S. and Spector, J.A.
Surgical Infections. 2013; 14(3): 244-269
[Pubmed]
3 Surgical site abdominal wound infections: Experience at a north Indian tertiary care hospital
Kakati, B. and Kumar, A. and Gupta, P. and Sachan, P.K. and Thakuria, B.
Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 2013; 14(1): 13-19
[Pubmed]
4 MRSA infections following colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme
Phillips, A.W. and Cranfield, K.J. and Horgan, A.F.
Colorectal Disease. 2013; 15(1): 97-101
[Pubmed]
5 Prolonged versus short course of Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean general surgery
Ali, M. and Nadeem, M. and Shah, S.Z.A. and Khan, M.M. and Ahmad, M. and Ullah, M.A.
Journal of Medical Sciences (Peshawar). 2012; 20(3): 128-132
[Pubmed]
6 Prevalence of bacterial contamination in general operating theaters in selected hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine
Al Laham, N.A.
Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2012; 5(1): 43-51
[Pubmed]
7 Study of surgical site infections in abdominal surgeries
Satyanarayana, V. and Prashanth, H.V. and Basavaraj, B. and Kavyashree, A.N.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(5): 935-939
[Pubmed]
8 The in vitro effect of vancomycin on multidrug resistant staphylococcus aureus from hospital currency notes
Adegoke, A.A. and Okoh, A.I.
African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2011; 5(14): 1881-1887
[Pubmed]
9 A study on surgical site infections caused by staphylococcus aureus with a special search for methicillin-resistant isolates
Naik, G. and Deshpande, S.R.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(3): 502-508
[Pubmed]
10 Prospective randomized open labeled study comparing prophylactic efficacy of parenteral single dose cefuroxime vs Ampicillin-Sulbactam in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy
Jan, N. and Abbas, Z. and Ahmed, M.N. and Tandon, V.R. and Imran, M. and Parveen, S. and Bhat, G.H.
JK Science. 2011; 14(2): 77-81
[Pubmed]
11 Nosocomial bacterial infections in a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia
Endalafer, N. and Gebre-Selassie, S. and Kotiso, B.
Journal of Infection Prevention. 2011; 12(1): 38-43
[Pubmed]
12 Nosocomial bacterial infections in a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia
Endalafer, N., Gebre-Selassie, S., Kotiso, B.
Journal of Infection Preventions. 2011; 12(1): 38-43
[Pubmed]
13 Studies on multiple antibiotic resistant bacterial isolated from surgical site infection
Adegoke, A., Mvuyo, T., Okoh, A.I., Steve, J.
Scientific Research and Essays. 2010; 5(24): 3876-3881
[Pubmed]
14 A prospective study of surgical site infections in a teaching hospital
Mahesh, C.B., Shivakumar, S., Suresh, B.S., Chidanand, S.P., Vishwanath, Y.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010; 4(5): 3114-3119
[Pubmed]
15 Surveillance of nosocomial infections in general surgery unit: Data of ten years period
stn, C., Geyik, M.F., Aldemir, M., Tekin, R., elen, M.K., Girgin, S., Hosoǧlu, S., Ayaz, C.
Duzce Medical Journal. 2010; 12(3): 1-6
[Pubmed]
16 Analysis of risk factors for surgical-site infections in 276 oral cancer surgeries with microvascular free-flap reconstructions at a single university hospital
Karakida, K., Aoki, T., Ota, Y., Yamazaki, H., Otsuru, M., Takahashi, M., Sakamoto, H., Miyasaka, M.
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2010; 16(5): 334-339
[Pubmed]
17 Influence of ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index on the surgical site infection rates
Khan, M., Rooh-ul-Muqim, Zarin, M., Khalil, J., Salman, M.
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2010; 20(8): 506-509
[Pubmed]
18 Surgical site infections in a tertiary health care center: Prospective cohort study
Suljagić, V., Jevtic, M., Djordjevic, B., Jovelic, A.
Surgery Today. 2010; 40(8): 763-771
[Pubmed]
19 A prospective study of surgical site infections in a teaching hospital
Mahesh, C.B. and Shivakumar, S. and Suresh, B.S. and Chidanand, S.P. and Vishwanath, Y.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010; 4(5): 3114-3119
[Pubmed]
20 Surveillance of nosocomial infections in general surgery unit: Data of ten years period
Üstün, C. and Geyik, M.F. and Aldemir, M. and Tekin, R. and Çelen, M.K. and Girgin, S. and Hosoǧlu, S. and Ayaz, C.
Duzce Medical Journal. 2010; 12(3): 1-6
[Pubmed]
21 Analysis of risk factors for surgical-site infections in 276 oral cancer surgeries with microvascular free-flap reconstructions at a single university hospital
Karakida, K. and Aoki, T. and Ota, Y. and Yamazaki, H. and Otsuru, M. and Takahashi, M. and Sakamoto, H. and Miyasaka, M.
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2010; 16(5): 334-339
[Pubmed]
22 Modulation of the local neutrophil response by a novel hyaluronic acid-binding peptide reduces bacterial burden during staphylococcal wound infection
Lee, J.C. and Greenwich, J.L. and Zhanel, G.G. and Han, X. and Cumming, A. and Saward, L. and McLoughlin, R.M.
Infection and Immunity. 2010; 78(10): 4176-4186
[Pubmed]
23 Influence of ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index on the surgical site infection rates
Khan, M. and Rooh-ul-Muqim and Zarin, M. and Khalil, J. and Salman, M.
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2010; 20(8): 506-509
[Pubmed]
24 Surgical site infections in a tertiary health care center: Prospective cohort study
Suljagić, V. and Jevtic, M. and Djordjevic, B. and Jovelic, A.
Surgery Today. 2010; 40(8): 763-771
[Pubmed]
25 Decreasing expander breast infection: A new drain care protocol
Murray, J.D., Elwood, E.T., Jones, G.E., Barrick, R., Feng, J.
Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2009; 17(1): 17-21
[Pubmed]
26 Benefit of a single preoperative dose of antibiotics in a sub-saharan district hospital: Minimal input, massive impact
Saxer, F., Widmer, A., Fehr, J., Soka, I., Kibatala, P., Urassa, H., Frei, R., (...), Hatz, C
Annals of Surgery. 2009; 249(2): 322-326
[Pubmed]
27 Surgical Site Infections in Plastic Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Study
Drapeau, C.M.J., DAniello, C., Brafa, A., Nicastri, E., Silvestri, A., Nisi, G., Petrosillo, N.
Journal of Surgical Research. 2007; 143(2): 393-397
[Pubmed]
28 Survey and evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis usage in surgery wards of tertiary level institution before and after the implementation of clinical guidelines
Khan, S., Rao, P., Rao, A., Rodrigues, G.
Indian J Surg. 2006; 68(3): 150-156
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04