Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology IAMM  | About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Ahead of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions  
Users Online: 719 Official Publication of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists 
 ~   Next article
 ~   Previous article
 ~   Table of Contents

 ~   Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~   Citation Manager
 ~   Access Statistics
 ~   Reader Comments
 ~   Email Alert *
 ~   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1469    
    Printed73    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 
Year : 1998  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23-25

Evaluation of two immunochromatographic assays in relation to `RAPID' Screening of HBsAG


Department of Clinical virology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore 632 004

Correspondence Address:
P Abraham
Department of Clinical virology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore 632 004

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

ABSTRACT: Two immunochromatography based assays used for purposes of rapid screening for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAG) were compared to our in-use third generation HBsAG ELISA, using a panel of 50 sera. Both assays yielded a similar sensitivity and specificity of 90 percent and 100 percent respectively. However, when both assays were evaluated independently using two sets of 400 consecutive sera, the Quickchaser and Virucheck assays yielded a sensitivity of 77 percent and 79 percent respectively and specificity of 99 percent and 97 percent respectively. the HBsAG positive sera missed by the Quickchaser assay were of significantly lower reactivity compared to those HBsAG containing sera that were positive by this assay and the ELISA, whereas for the Virucheck assay there was no such significant difference. The difference in evaluation results while using a smaller evaluation panel of 50 sera and large evaluation panel of 400 sera could be explained by a difference in the range of reactivities within both the panels and also a difference in panel size. This study reveals the need for a large panel of sera while evaluating tests to avoid overestimating the accuracy indices.






[PDF Not available]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Online since April 2001, new site since 1st August '04